Support the Café

Search our Site

On General Convention and the proposed Missionary Convocation

On General Convention and the proposed Missionary Convocation

With the exception of its proposal to limit the legislation that comes before General Convention by topic, perhaps the most significant proposal the Task Force for Reimagining the Episcopal Church makes in its recent paper is to introduce a Missionary Convocation as a second but equally important part of the church’s triennial meeting. I image that I could be talked into thinking that this was a good idea, but currently I think it is a questionable one.

I am not exactly opposed to a Missionary Convocation (especially if we call it something else), but the spirit in which the task force offers this proposal makes it seem a form or moral correction, a means of redeeming adult Christians who have committed the sin of involving themselves in shady business of legislative governance.

Consider the language. The taskforce says it is “lay[ing] the groundwork for a General Convention with two primary foci: (1) An opportunity to convene a vibrant, inspiring, mission-driven convocation that connects, builds up, and empowers leaders at all levels for spreading the Gospel in new and innovative ways (2) A triennial Church legislature enacting budgets, passing resolutions, electing members of interim governing bodies, and other related governance functions.

The italics are mine, but you’d probably get the point without them. Focus #1 makes people dance and Jesus smile. Focus #2 puts everyone to sleep.

I don’t believe that governing the church is a necessary evil. It is, rather, an opportunity to proclaim the gospel, call disciples and play a small role in ushering in the reign of God through legislative action. Not everyone is called to this work, or well suited to it. There are, as somebody wrote somewhere, many gifts, but one spirit. But those who are called to this ministry, and chosen by their peers to do it should not be made to feel as though they are engaged in a dubious enterprise and that they need to hurry up and get on with it so that the real Christians can take the stage.

As for the Missionary Convocation itself, we’d be launching what is at its core an ambitious one-site, in-person adult education enterprise at a time when educators around the church, long frustrated by low enrollments in their classes and poor turnouts for their events, are putting more and more of their content online. That doesn’t mean that the idea for convocation isn’t worth nurturing, or that it may be lifted by an energy that I don’t now detect. But, at the moment, I am skeptical that lay people who have children and don’t work in the church are going to take a week’s worth of vacation, fly across the country and stay in hotel rooms to attend several days worth of adult education opportunities.

There is often a wonderful spirit at General Convention, especially at social gatherings and Eucharists. I understand entirely the desire to recapture this spirit in a context not burdened by a legislative agenda. But I am not persuaded that grafting a Missionary Convocation onto a legislative convention is a wise move, and I do not want to put the effectiveness of the convention in jeopardy by accepting this proposal in its current form.

That said, I don’t think anyone who cares about church governance is unaware that a significant segment of the church feels alienated from the General Convention, the Executive Council and the churchwide staff. A Missionary Convocation might have the potential to bring different people with different talents and interests to the convention, and in so doing make the church’s triennial meeting a richer experience for everyone involved. And it might make more church members feel a connection to the triennial gathering, which I think would be a good thing. I am wondering, then, if there is a way to pilot this proposal, and possibly advance it in stages, rather than taking it in one gulp.

Phasing the convocation in would give the church the opportunity to evaluate whether it is working. It would give the convocation an opportunity to build an audience that I am not sure now exists. And it might even get some members of the task force past the false choice between good mission v bad government dynamic that is evident in their major recommendations regarding General Convention.


Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Michael Hartney

I, too, was present at that Special Convention in 1969 but I don’t think that it was the General Convention at its best. It was after all a ‘special’ convention called to deal with particular issues. Conventions since then, 1970-2012 have had some wonderful moments and Christian witness to the Gospel. I would not sell any of those General Conventions short. In fact, the General Convention of 2012 was a very good one – with well-run legislative committee meetings on a whole host of issues.

I have served as the Legislative Aide to, or as a member of, the Cognate Committee on Ministry for the last 6 Conventions. This hard-working committee would be sorely missed by its consolidation into another committee. What is really broken about the system we have? It is getting better and better each Triennium.

William R. MacKaye

General Conventions are primarily for legislation and should stay that way. The problem with GCs is far more the venues. The most effective convention I ever attended was the Special General Convention of 1969, which met on the campus of Notre Dame University over Labor Day weekend. Deputies stayed in college dormitories, and there was nothing to do except the church’s business. And, oh boy, did they do business! Costs were low, attention was focused, and the Spirit was hovering overhead with wings spread wide.

Paul Woodrum

Now that we’ve become so theologically pure, does anyone have Catechism (aka Confirmation) classes anymore? Maybe that’s where we really need to begin.

tobias haller

Quick reaction: One of the “Grand Illusions” of TEC is that GC is some kind of “homecoming” celebration that produces lots of feel-good mission inspiration. Simply not true. This is just not the sort of thing that makes sense at a(n) (inter)national level. Much more likely to produce effects regionally or locally.

This is a classic example of inverted subsidiarity — it is never a good idea to try to do centrally what is best done grassroots.

Jesse Zink

I think Ann’s point is largely right. I also wonder if the kind of people who come to a GC are the kind of people who would benefit from / be interested in such a convocation. If not, that means flying more people in, putting them up for several nights, feeding them, etc. I thought the church was trying to reduce costs. And all the other usual issues about GC remain unaddressed in terms of the Convocation: having people use up vacation time in the summer, lack of childcare, etc.

The Diocese of Connecticut today is having its annual mission conference. I don’t know this for sure, but I suspect the attendees will not likely include many members of the CT GC delegation but will include the kind of people who would never consider putting their name forward for GC.

Perhaps the middle ground is more such local conferences, with a deliberate effort to make them regional but not national in scope.

Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café