Support the Café

Search our Site

No ethical dilemma for NewsCorp’s Zondervan

No ethical dilemma for NewsCorp’s Zondervan

Zondervan, owned by Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation, does not see any ethical dilemma for them in the wake of the revelations of the phone-hacking scandal according to the Church Times:

ZONDERVAN, the American Christian publisher, issued a statement this week saying that the phone-hacking scandal “does not present an ethical dilemma”, despite its being a division of HarperCollins, which is owned by News Corporation.

On Tuesday, Rupert Murdoch, the chairman of News Corporation, and his son James, the chairman and chief executive of News Corporation Europe and Asia, gave evidence to the House of Commons Culture Committee about phone hacking that took place at one of the company’s news papers, theNews of the World.

A spokeswoman for Zondervan, which holds exclusive rights to publish the New International Version of the Bible in North America, said: “This does not present an ethical dilemma for Zondervan, as we will continue to operate with autonomy as we always have. . . While we are obviously aware of the matter at hand, it does not distract or detract from our work at hand, and we will continue to pursue our mission and operate as we have for the past 80 years.”

Others think Zondervan’s response is inadequate:

Shane Claiborne, a Christian activist whose books are published by Zondervan, and who is speaking at the Greenbelt Festival this year, told the magazine Geez: “The current issues in England raise all kinds of ethical questions, and I would hope that a company whose mission is explicitly Christian, as Zondervan’s is, would take the opportunity to bear witness and to speak into the culture which is so terribly fallen.”


Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café