Support the Café
Search our site

No justice, no peace; know justice, know peace

No justice, no peace; know justice, know peace

Lawrence Provenzano, Bishop of Long Island, wrote a letter asking his clergy to avoid protests following the tragic and senseless murders of two police officers in Brooklyn.

From his letter:

I am asking that our clergy stand down from the organizing and protesting that has filled the streets with people following the failure to indict police in the Eric Garner and Michael Brown cases.  There is always room for prophetic witness and the striving for justice and peace among all people.  But now I am asking that we strive, and teach and practice peace and peacemaking. I am asking us to put the needs of our young people, their families and communities first. Violence cannot be a response to violence. Hatred must be remedied by love – love incarnate, made real by those who are called to be the Body of Christ.

Provenzano is wrong in implying that we can’t protest the injustices of the judicial system while simultaneously practicing peace and peacemaking. Justice and peace are not opposing ideals; they are complementary, and without one, we do not have the other. The enduring protest chant “No Justice, No Peace” refers to the experience of victims of injustice. It is a statement that exposes the hypocrisy of referring to the quietly oppressed as ‘peaceful’. Peace is not found in the submissive acceptance of oppression, but in the absence of oppression. It is neither a call to violence nor to disruption of the peace of others, but a call to bring justice and peace to all.

Asking clergy to avoid the protests also suggests that the protesters are the source of the tensions and racial divide. This dangerous implication ignores the racial division and strife that can be traced back to the founding of our nation, and blames oppressed people for speaking up about the discrimination and injustice they face.

The parallels drawn between the protests and the tragic murder of two police officers is reductive and overly simplistic. Viewing this recent murder as an extension of the protests not only fails to account for the reality of the peaceful protests; it also fails to account for the extensive criminal record of the alleged shooter, or the shooting of his ex-girlfriend, the day he travelled to New York. In the full context of this crime, it seems to be a violent outburst by a deeply-disturbed man, not a carefully planned act of revenge.

The protests started out of outrage that the due process of law was not applied in instances where officers killed black men. Calls for indictments and juried trials are not calls for violence, nor are they celebrating extrajudicial killings. In protesting death and injustice, it is hard to imagine that the clergy in Long Island were attending protests which would cheer for these tragic deaths.

There is no cognitive dissonance in seeking justice for black victims of state violence and feeling heartbroken over the murders of these two police officers. The protests are part of an important conversation about racial injustice that we largely seek to avoid. It is especially hard to have this conversation now, because so many in power have mistakenly seen the protests as an attack and an assault on individual men and women, and not as a valid criticism of the systems in place that perpetuate racial injustice. It is disappointing to see Bishop Provenzano share this misapprehension, and even more disappointing to see him misuse his privilege and power to ask his clergy to stop having a difficult conversation.

 

Bishop of New York, Andrew M.L. Dietsche, offers a statement closer to the values of the Episcopal church in a different letter. Dietsche prays for all the victims of violence, while clearly stating the values of the diocese and a commitment to continue to seek justice. Sadly, though, he also seems to misunderstand an important message, in titling his letter “To God, ALL Lives Matter”.

In a culture that rarely expresses a consensus of outrage when a black life is lost, “Black Lives Matter” is an important statement that counters the dominant cultural apathy towards black lives. It is not a statement that needs rebuttal, and the response “All Lives Matter” is frequently used to rebuke black voices protesting the disinterest of white America.

It is a subtle, but troubling, criticism of “Black Lives Matter”, and it’s inappropriate in the context of the rest of his letter, which is bold in continuing to call for justice in the case of Garner and hope and healing for the two officers. It seems likely that Dietsche is unaware of the troubling use of “All Lives Matter”, and that his intention was not the rejection of black voices, but instead to state clearly the sanctity of all life.

Bree Carlson, writing for Common Dreams, explains why the comparisons made by Provenzano and statements like “All Lives Matter” are so dangerous.

From her essay:

Comparing the killing of the two officers with those of Michael Brown and Eric Garner is dangerous and misleading. It asks all of us to pretend that power has nothing to do with the equation and to assume one man, apparently dealing with mental illness of some kind, operating alone and without the sanction or support of any organized group, be put in the same category as the combined armed, organized, force of police departments through out the United States. It is our hope that Mayor de Blasio will rescind his call to suspend protests in New York and that the NYPD will ignore reactionary calls for escalation. Irresponsible, uninformed accusations blaming protesters for the officers’ deaths serve only to ratchet up tensions and do not increase public safety. What is needed, in fact, is continued support for on-going, non-violent protests and demonstrations calling for reforms that end racially biased police practices and increase public safety.

Abandoning our calls for justice will not honor the lives of those killed, nor will it bring about peace. Rather, it is by courageously seeking justice that we can honor the lives of officers Liu and Ramos, and bring about the peace that we all so dearly need.

Posted by David Streever

Dislike (1)
0 0 vote
Article Rating
Facebooktwitterpinterestlinkedinmail

Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

22 Comments
Newest
Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
June Butler

Martin Luther King wrote his "Letter from a Birmingham Jail" to the white clergy in Alabama. 'While confined here in the Birmingham city jail, I came across your recent statement calling my present activities "unwise and untimely."'

Are protests ever wise and timely for those who are troubled or inconvenienced by them?

Bishop Provenzano, the priests in your diocese are adults who ought to be able to decide for themselves whether they join peaceful protests.

Like (2)
Dislike (0)
June Butler

Martin Luther King wrote his "Letter from a Birmingham Jail" to the white clergy in Alabama. 'While confined here in the Birmingham city jail, I came across your recent statement calling my present activities "unwise and untimely."'

Are peaceful protests ever "wise and timely" for those who are troubled or inconvenienced by them?

Bp. Provenzano, the priests in your diocese are grown-ups and ought to be permitted to decide for themselves whether to participate in peaceful protests.

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
Kenneth Knapp

I will pray for you.

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
Cynthia

"Every one who disagrees with me is in my condescending prayers."

Dear Kenneth, denial is a kind of illness. It isn't a matter of disagreement. We have a big problem of "justice for all," it clearly isn't a reality. The data is overwhelming. So to deny it isn't a "disagreement," it's an illness.

The area of disagreement is what do we do about the injustice? The bishop of L.I. is asking for time to grieve while others do not want the protests to stop, or be linked to the awful murder of the two police officers. It's the bishop's turf, I'm 2000 miles away. I have been in the thick of similar incidents.

I am coming to the conclusion that the first order of business, within the church, is extensive dialogues. There needs to be lots of story telling. Many of us have recently signed the Charter for Compassion that's been making the rounds. We need to see what compassion looks like in our communities, in our racial and civic relationships. I'm no more racist than anyone, but my tax dollars pay for the militarization of the police, and supports polices and training that aren't serving all people, to say the very least.

You can call it condescending. But there are people that I love that don't need to hear more of the denial and hostility of Chris. Note that he conflated the Mike Brown situation with the Eric Garner case. That isn't exactly healthy.

The Incarnation has arrived. Our job is to make room in our hearts for the Prince of Peace. What is that going to look like in our racial relationships?

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
Cynthia

Philip, the police version of their rules of engagement, as I understand it, calls for shooting at the torso, and shooting until the "threat" is neutralized. So their policy is always massive lethal force to any "perceived" threat. In some countries the police are unarmed and they need alternative methods of de-escalating things, and they seem pretty good at it in the UK. The police in the US would argue, reasonably, that with so many guns on the street, they need to stay armed...

The rash of unjust and ambiguous shootings (77 percent of ambiguous ones involve black male victims) convince me that their rules of engagement and their training needs significant upgrading. Oh, ambiguous meaning the victim turned out to be unarmed.

Merry Christmas.

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
Facebooktwitterrss
Support the Café
Past Posts
2020_001

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café