Support the Café

Search our Site

Nicholas Kristof’s definition of religion

Nicholas Kristof’s definition of religion

In a candid column (not unusual) about his own religion (not as usual), the New York Times’ Nicholas Kristof explores the current perceptions of religious ritual, dogmatism, interpretation and exclusion, in Christianity but also in Judaism and Islam.

Jesus never mentioned gays or abortion but focused on the sick and the poor, yet some Christian leaders have prospered by demonizing gays. Muhammad raised the status of women in his time, yet today some Islamic clerics bar women from driving, or cite religion as a reason to hack off the genitals of young girls. Buddha presumably would be aghast at the apartheid imposed on the Rohingya minority by Buddhists in Myanmar.

“Our religions often stand for the very opposite of what their founders stood for,” notes Brian D. McLaren, a former pastor, in a provocative and powerful new book, “The Great Spiritual Migration.”

Skepticism, hypocrisy, modernization, religious illiteracy and the struggle over Biblical literalism are contributing to the increase of “nones” – young people (primarily) who are nonreligious or “spiritual,” without a denominational affiliation.

It is not just Christianity, of course, that is grappling with these questions. Rabbi Rick Jacobs, the president of the Union for Reform Judaism, said that he sees a desire for a social justice mission inspired and balanced by faith traditions.

“That’s where I see our path,” Jacobs said. “People have seen ritual as an obsession for the religious community, and they haven’t seen the courage and commitment to shaping a more just and compassionate world.”

If certain religious services were less about preening about one’s own virtue or pointing fingers at somebody else’s iniquity and more about tackling human needs around us, this would be a better world — and surely Jesus would applaud as well.

Kristof admits that he is stepping out of his comfort zone to write this column:

This may seem an unusual column for me to write, for I’m not a particularly religious Christian. But I do see religious faith as one of the most important forces, for good and ill, and I am inspired by the efforts of the faithful who run soup kitchens and homeless shelters.

Read the entire column here.


Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

1 Comment
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
William Veinot

My nephew was married outside this Sunday in Mystic, Connecticut overlooking the historic seaport. The weather held and the spirit was wonderful. The happy bride had a dynamic Jesuit as an uncle and my nephew had his “favorite uncle” an Episcopal priest present. But neither of us were asked to officiate. A lay person became licensed for a day. There was no mention to speak of God. This is now, at least here in the Northeast the new normal. One aspect of this new “Migration.”
When I do not officiate I normally choose to dress in shirt and tie when attending a wedding. My wife was surprised to see me looking like well dressed Episcopal priest. I choose to do it to witness my calling as a follower of the Christ. My garb actually prompted interesting conversation thought the evening.
We spend a lot of time in the Church discussing what we have done “wrong.” Sometimes when I see how hard we work for justice, I wonder if we are much to hard on ourselves. My college age daughter tells me she thinks her fellow younger friends find it rather in vogue to walk a “none” path. Its become in her mind, “way to trendy.”
As wonderful as the wedding was something seemed honestly missing. If it’s true “God has no grandchildren” watching this playout now over years and years I fear for those coming after me.

Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café