Neither hot nor cold: General Convention on Palestine/Israel

by

The Revds. Winnie Varghese and C. Eric Funston express their disappointment in the lack of discussion allowed or action taken by General Convention 2015 on Israel/Palestine. The resolution died in the House of Bishops, never getting to the House of Deputies.

From Varghese in the Huffington Post, “Episcopal Bishops Did Not Reject Divestment from Israel”

Last week The Episcopal News Service ran this headline: “Bishops Overwhelmingly Oppose Divestment in Israel, Palestine”.

Except, they didn’t…

…I was on the sub committee of the committee that considered all of the resolutions that related to any kind of shareholder action in relationship to the occupation of Palestine. We moved a very mild resolution that asked that the church investigate its investments that support the occupation and generate a list of products produced in the illegal settlements. We were told by very excited staff that we do not hold any such investments, until we were told by less excited staff that we do hold problematic investments. We have nothing in place to prevent future investments. That was just the beginning of the fun. The illegality of both the occupation and the settlements was not debated. In our church they are non negotiable. The Church of England, the mother ship, has modeled for us a way forward to consider our significant holdings with integrity. We included their good work in our resolution.

It was this resolution that the bishops rejected…

…We are currently being targeted by advocacy groups whose agenda is to insure no public criticism of Israel, none, not of occupation; illegal settlement; or illegal attack. It is perverse that we as Christians will undermine the voices of Palestinian Christians who have worked for decades on non-violent resistance in the Occupied Territories. Palestinian Christians are overwhelmingly Orthodox, Roman Catholic, and Anglican. We are on the record as abandoning them and the oldest sites of Christian worship that are currently under attack by extremist Israelis. …

…I do not live under the delusion that the government of Israel cares what the Episcopal Church does. I know that there are plenty of well paid people whose work it is to insure that Israel is never criticized. I know the bishop of Jerusalem will have trouble with the government of Israel no matter what we do; he is a resident of the West Bank and vulnerable. I know plenty of Israelis and American Jews who are appalled by the state of the Occupation and have dedicated their lives to justice for Palestinians and security for Israel. I do not understand how intelligent people can believe that interfaith conversation and more site seeing trips with no risk-taking on our part and no use of power: financial, political, or moral is anything but an adventure in vanity…

…I will never understand why we would not listen first to our brothers and sisters truly on the ground, the lay and ordained Palestinian Christians who have been displaced; who work for justice; and who ask for our help.

Read it all here.

 

From Funston’s blog “That Which We Have Heard and Known” Neither Hot nor Cold

… It’s not that the [statements we did make] are not important and vital issues; they are. It’s not that our voice, added to so many others, is not worth raising about these issues; it is. It’s not that we should not be taking a stand on these matters; we should. We should and we have and we will continue to do so, but we are not being particularly prophetic when we do so. We are merely doing what comes naturally moving a large, heavy institution over the rough terrain of difficult issues. Like Uzzah steadying the Ark of the Covenant, it may be dangerous, but it’s not particularly prophetic.

We did have the opportunity to be prophetic, but we failed to take it. A resolution numbered D016 was offered for our consideration. It would have called upon our church and our leadership to

“work earnestly and with haste to avoid profiting from the illegal occupation of Gaza and the West Bank, and [to] seek to align itself with, and learn from, the good work of our Ecumenical and Anglican Communion partners, who have worked for decades in support of our Palestinian Christian sisters and brothers and others oppressed by occupation. (Resolution D016 as originally proposed)”

It did not call for divestment from Israeli investments. It did not call for the boycotting of products made in the occupied territories. It did not call for sanctions against Israel. It did not call upon us to join the “BDS” movement as it is called – Boycott, Divest, Sanction. It was opposed on the grounds that it did, but in truth it did not.

We could have taken such action; we could have joined BDS although the resolution did not call for it. Alternatively, we could have proclaimed that, instead of doing that, we would work through positive investment and constructive engagement with both Israelis and Palestinians to foster reconciliation and peace. Or, we could simply have done as the resolution sought and undertaken a time of intentional study and discernment as to what our ministry as a church with important ties to the Holy Land might be, how we might try to encourage healing in that broken, wounded, and bleeding place. We could have done any of those things, any of those prophetic things. But do you know what we did?

We ducked the issue. We played it safe. We closed off debate. We failed to act. The House of Bishops rejected Resolution D016 so the House of Deputies never had a chance to consider it and, thus, we did nothing. – We should know better!…

Read more here


 

 

posted by Ann Fontaine

Dislike (0)
Facebooktwittergoogle_pluspinterestlinkedinmail
newest oldest
Notify of
Paul Woodrum
Guest

Every time a representative of the government of Israel opposes American negotiations with Iran over atomic weapons (Iran has none), I wish the reporter would ask how many Israel has. I guess it's one of those questions we're not allowed to ask, in part, no doubt, because of our own complicity.

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
Vicki Gray
Guest

"One sided judgements will not make it happen."
But the situation is one-sided. One people is on its knees. The other has a gone to their head. And we - we Americans - have paid for the gun. That imposes a particular obligation upon us...as Americans and as Christians.

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
Tim lusk
Guest
Tim lusk

The last time i spoke on this issue i got my hand slapped for daring to use a term that translate into antijewish. I will try soeak my peace and hope that we can be people od good will and agree to disagree. When the Palestinians were promised land several decades ago Egypt and Jordon took 2/3 of that land. During ongoing discussions of Palestinian rights no one every presses these two countries on the issue. Israel is surrounded by nations that have called for its destruction and continue to up to this day. Hamas who controls parts of Palestinian land wants every jew in the middle east dead. The Palestinian people voted hamas into power. This is a complicated situation which the writers seem to ignore. I am glad the wiser heads prevaled at general conference. I will continue to prayer for peace in the middle east. One sided judgements will not make it happen

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
JC Fisher
Guest
JC Fisher

"This is a complicated situation which the writers seem to ignore."

OK, gotta ask: did you read what the Revds. Winnie Varghese and C. Eric Funston actually said, at length or even in brief?

Disagree with them as you will, but to say they ignore the "complicated situation" that is Israel/Palestine is just factually false. There weren't "wiser heads" in the HofB. There were just buried heads, trying to shut the "complicated situation" OUT. How long can heads be buried in sand? Another 3 years? Another 30?

"Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, expecting different results."

Like (0)
Dislike (0)