National Cathedral hosts Muslim prayer service

by

The Jumu’ah, the Friday communal prayers of Islam, were hosted by the Washington National Cathedral yesterday with an invited group of Muslims and Christians and heavy security. The event was organized by The Very Rev. Gary Hall, dean of the cathedral, and Ebrahim Rasool, a Muslim scholar and South Africa’s ambassador to the United States.

The Washington Post describes the event:

Numerous speakers, including cathedral officials and local Muslim leaders, echoed Rasool’s message about the urgent need for religious understanding and collaboration. Most made pointed references to the symbolism of the majestic Christian building, where rugs had been laid for prayer.

The Very Rev. Gary Hall, dean of the cathedral, spoke of Saint Benedict, who he said believed equally in the importance of prayer and hospitality. Marveling at the sounds of Arabic prayers, which he called “a beautiful sacred language in a beautiful sacred space,” Hall said he hoped the service would serve as the start of more efforts to work together for good.

Other speakers said they hoped the service would help correct some Americans’ misperceptions of Muslims as extremists and reinforce tolerance among faiths.

“Salaam, shalom, peace. You are all so very welcome here,” said the Rev. Canon Gina Gilland Campbell, the cathedral’s director of liturgy, in an open greeting.

The event was not without controversy. Despite the security, one of the people present rose to protest and was escorted out.

Nevertheless, the carefully scripted ceremony was marred once when one well-dressed, middle-age woman in the audience suddenly rose and began shouting that “America was founded on Christian principles. . . . Leave our church alone!” She was swiftly ushered out by security aides, and the service continued.

On Facebook, Frederick William Schmidt was critical of the event:

Friend and colleague, The Reverend Samira Izadi expresses her own bafflement at the decision of Washington National Cathedral to host a Muslim worship service. My response to her post:

Samira, well said. Authentic inter-religious dialogue requires the recognition of difference, not erasing it. Until we own who we are and recognize what Muslims believe and then, in the light of that difference, begin a conversation, real tolerance cannot exist. If what we do is surrender our beliefs, our boundaries, our worship spaces, our sacraments, and then say, “Let’s talk about what we hold in common,” then we will find ourselves talking about something no one believes. I don’t think that Muslims ought to be worshiping in Christian spaces. That said, I don’t think that Christians ought to be invited to worship in a mosque. To say, let’s talk about what we hold in common is to talk about something that no one believes; and the conceit that this “common conviction” exists is a piece of Enlightenment conceit….which is elitist and imperialistic in its own

way.

Susan Russell writing in the HuffPo, partly in response to flood of critical comments on social media, talks about why this service was important in terms of both the civic and religious discourse in our nation:

Yes, there are texts in the Koran that condone violence. I’ll see you and raise you a boatload of texts in the Bible. (Start with 2 Samuel – but only if you have a really strong stomach.)

Yes, there are Muslims who advocate murder for “infidels,” behead journalists and discriminate against minorities – using their religion as an excuse for their violent extremism. There are also Christians who blow up women’s health clinics, burn crosses on lawns and lynch their African-American neighbors – using their religion as an excuse for their violent extremism.

The truth is that ISIS is to Islam what the KKK is to Christianity. It is long past time for those Christians so busy beating up Muslims with their Bibles to go re-read the part where Jesus called us to love – not to demonize – our neighbors. And to remember that this nation was founded by those with the wisdom to understand that in order to protect our freedom of religion we also need protection from religion – and from presuming to prioritize our beliefs over the beliefs … or lack of belief, for that matter … of anybody else.

And so I give thanks that today in our National Cathedral we were blessed by the witness of faith leaders standing, speaking and praying from the firm foundation of those traditional American Values. I find hope in being reminded again today — from both the Christian and the Muslim leaders gathered in our National House of Prayer for ALL People — that we can make a difference in the world by standing together. And so I pray in these words from the closing prayer in today’s Friday Prayers (Jumu’ah)

“We pray for protection from those who would divide us. God bless America and God Bless the world.”

And let ALL God’s people say “Amen.”

Dislike (0)
Facebooktwitterpinterestlinkedinmail
newest oldest
Notify of
Chris H.
Guest
Chris H.

Jim,Jean's comment was about how nice the Muslim's words were and how they weren't preaching the Koran or desecrating the altar as I assumed. I was hoping she'd give more info, say they weren't IN the sanctuary, at the alter etc. , and to see if someone had done some homework on the speeches or how this was seen by Muslims, etc. I was hoping for some TEC rebuttal of the critics. I still don't have it. TEC is standing by its decision, but not explaining it.(f TEC has been having these interfaith meetings for decades, why advertise it as a first? I see no presumption of good will or understanding in your comment re Schmidt or others here toward Christians who think the sanctity of the Cathedral should be protected. TEC is supposed to be a church that welcomes questions, is educated, and savy, but nobody in the planning group asked, "What message are we sending? What will people think having a religion that kills Christians and its own members lead a service to their god in our grandest church?" etc....

Some of it is hateful trash, yes, but is all the criticism? When I was living in Turkey I discovered, badly, that Muslims can be like the British--very polite to your face, even friendly, but their words are really an insult, including when they're quoting the Koran. So yes, I'm suspicious and surprised that TEC is unprepared for the backlash.

Chris Harwood

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
Jim Naughton
Guest
Jim Naughton

Chris, you seem to be arguing here:

"Since I can't see the info at the site I can't tell whether those who claim the Muslim groups involved have ties to terrorist groups and ISIL might be right, nor can I see if the quotes from the Koran are parts of Anti-Christian texts as some are claiming."

that because for some reason you cannot access the Cathedral's website, you are therefore free from any presumption of good will about fellow Christians (or for that matter the most elementary searching of Google news) and can believe whatever hateful trash people have put out there about this service.

Is this, in fact, your position?

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
Chris H.
Guest
Chris H.

Jean, I'm afraid I can't access the Cathedral's website. Was the meeting in a chapel? Or does the Cathedral have another common area where the meeting took place away from the sanctuary? Since I can't see the info at the site I can't tell whether those who claim the Muslim groups involved have ties to terrorist groups and ISIL might be right, nor can I see if the quotes from the Koran are parts of Anti-Christian texts as some are claiming. After all, only using half a verse is common in the lectionary as well, and there are times when the meaning changes completely when you read the whole thing. If you want a house of prayer for many religions, don't call it a cathedral, which is a Christian church containing the bishop's seat, or so said the priest who taught catechism.

How to stop the attacks from conservatives? "You don't use the alter cloths and chalice at the potluck for cake and juice and don't use the sanctuary as a jungle gym" as my priest said once when I was a child and he was teaching us what "holy" meant. There's nothing wrong with finding and supporting friends among the Muslim community, but find neutral territory or have each group make statements in their own sanctuaries. Or make it reciprocal-Muslims in Cathedral AND Christians in a Mosque. This was only one way, right? No reciprocity? Did they say anything since the new killing video came out?

Chris Harwood

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
Jean Lall
Guest
Jean Lall

The webcast of the service can be viewed at the National Cathedral website:

http://www.nationalcathedral.org/exec/cathedral/mediaPlayer2013?MediaID=MED-6UFN0-U50002&EventID=CAL-6UB8D-8Q000O

It is well worth watching. The thoughts and sentiments expressed by the Muslim speakers were very far from what Chris H. assumes. I think it was an important event and very much an expression of the mission of the Cathedral and of the Episcopal Church.

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
tgflux
Guest
tgflux

"What especially bothers me is that there is very little rebuttal on these sites from progressive Christians."

A very important subject, Gary, but WAY bigger than particular incident. How do we talk across the "Culture Wars" divide, when we have no neutral arbiter and hence, wildly different "facts"?

[Shorter: get into a "discussion" at iamconservative? I think I'd rather spork out my eyeballs! x_x]

JC Fisher

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
Gary Roberts
Guest
Gary Roberts

I'm curious if anyone else has noticed that this event has caused a firestorm of negative responses at conservative sites on Facebook and other sites, for example: http://www.ijreview.com/2014/11/202827-debug-this-33-muslim-prayer-national-cathedral/ . If you read the comments after the article you may find them scary and the cause for much concern. What especially bothers me is that there is very little rebuttal on these sites from progressive Christians. On the Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/iamconservative/posts/10153327554432971 there are currently 51,000+ likes, 14,000+ shares, and over 20,000 comments -- almost all full of venom and hate.

I posted: "The Episcopal Church built the Cathedral as a gift to the nation and to serve as spiritual home for the nation. Vision Statement. The National Cathedral will be a catalyst for spiritual harmony in our nation, renewal in the churches, reconciliation among faiths, and compassion in our world. I'm glad we keep drawing the circle around folks of all kinds and faiths -- that's what I see Jesus doing!" and it was not well received. The mean spirited responses to my comment are saddening and worrisome. Any thoughts about why we're ignoring this and how should we respond?

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
Eric Bonetti
Guest
Eric Bonetti

Chris:

For en excellent discussion of shared worship at the Dome of the Rock and its possibly pre-Abrahamic roots, see: http://ivarfjeld.com/2009/07/16/«jews-and-muslims-did-worship-together-at-dome-of-the-rock»/

Apparently, modern prejudices have led to the increased separation at that holy site.

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
Chris H.
Guest
Chris H.

Why can't we have interfaith conversations at neutral sites? There aren't any convention centers, town halls, etc. in Boston or D.C.? Churches aren't holy to people of other faiths, so why should they care? From their point of view they're bringing the truth to a place dedicated to error. Just because they started from the same faith origin doesn't make them equal. If it doesn't matter who teaches what where, then give Rev. Redding her job back. As an Episcopalian Muslim she'd be perfect leading an interfaith group.

Why must we assume that because Jesus ate with tax collectors and sinners, still Jews, that he wouldn't have a problem with Isis or Jupiter worshippers teaching in the synagogue? Seems more like he was trying to clean Judaism up, stopping those abusing the faith for their own ends. That's not the same as letting other religions into the synagogue for their own purposes.

Eric, I see Dome of the Rock more as proof that Muslims don't believe in sharing holy space. Since when are Christians or Jews allowed inside to worship? Aren't Jews are kept out, relegated to the outer wall? Same thing when I lived in Turkey. Churches were tainted until they became mosques. Better a shopping mall under the mosque, a la Kocatepe, than a Christian preaching in it.

Chris Harwood

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
Philip B. Spivey
Guest

Talking the talk and walking the walk; two very different things. Many blessings on our Washington Cathedral and St. Paul's in Boston. Critics of this kind of hospitality remind me of those who chastised Jesus for taking a meal with the "other".

How fearful should we be of losing our religious identity when sharing our sacred spaces with "(an)other"? How covetous should we be of "our" dome of the rock?

Sigmund Freud opined some four generations ago that: "...religion, even if calls itself a religion of love, must be hard and unloving to those who do not belong to it."

Shall we prove him wrong?

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
Terry Pannell
Guest
Terry Pannell

St. Paul's Episcopal Cathedral in Boston has hosted Muslim weekly prayer services since September 2000. St. Paul's calls itself a "House of Prayer for All." From what I have personally witnessed, they take that seriously. Evidently so do the folks at the National Cathedral. Blessings upon them both.

Terry Pannell

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
Paul Woodrum
Guest
Paul Woodrum

Sorry and surprised to see my qualified "Amen" was so quickly censored. Please, Café, don't become like Virtue and print only the party line.

[Editor's note: Paul, I thought the last paragraph of the comment we deleted contained an offensive figure of speech. Jim Naughton]

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
Eric Bonetti
Guest
Eric Bonetti

The problem with the notion that worship space should be used solely by one faith at a time is that, in many places, it doesn't work from a logistical or practical perspective. Case in point: The Dome of the Rock, sacred to all three Abrahamic faiths. Who is to decide who controls this space, and how is this to be accomplished? Like it or not, many of our faith's holiest sites are shared with others.

On a more transactional note, I've attended more than one Muslim worship service with friends where, as an outsider, I was much more warmly welcomed than was the case in some Episcopal churches. Many Muslim cultures have long traditions of extending a warm welcome to strangers, and in that regard, we could well learn from our Muslim brothers and sisters.

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
Jim Naughton
Guest
Jim Naughton

Fred Schmidt assumes that no at the National Cathedral has ever "own[ed] who we are and recognize[ed] what Muslims believe." This is condescending nonsense. Interfaith conversation among the three Abrahamic faiths has been going on at the Cathedral for decades. This kind of drive-by criticism from people who don't know their facts is wearisome.

Like (0)
Dislike (0)