Support the Café

Search our Site

National Cathedral Dean responds to inauguration controversy

National Cathedral Dean responds to inauguration controversy

Dean Hollerith of the Cathedral of Saints Peter and Paul, better known as the National Cathedral in Washington, D.C. yesterday posted a response to the controversy swirling around the cathedral’s decision to accept an invitation for one of the choirs to participate in the inauguration ceremony (they’re slated to offer their voices prior to the beginning of the actual event).

Also controversial is the decision to not include a sermon as part of the post-inaugural interfaith prayer service, apparently at the request of the President-elect.  Both of these decisions have elicited mostly negative reactions from Episcopalians across the church.

Though the Dean and Bishop Budde have made statements, the continuing rancor has prompted Dean Hollerith to offer a second public statement which is reprinted in full below.

In it he recalls actions of his predecessors and and seeks to make the claim that this decision is in continuity with a past history of the cathedral’s support for social justice.  He roots this decision though in an understanding that the church, and especially the cathedral have a mission to model civility;

“I understand the strong disagreement many people have with the decisions to accept an invitation for the Cathedral choir to sing at the Inauguration and for the Cathedral to host the Inaugural Prayer Service. I am sorry those decisions have caused such turmoil and pain. Yet I stand by those decisions — not because we are celebrating the President-elect, but because we want to model for him, and the rest of the country, an approach to civility.”

The comments on our stories related to this decision and controversy (here, here, here, here, and here, if you’re up for it) suggest that a desire for justice is paramount to all, but that there is a sharp divide over how best to achieve that and what are the necessary pre-conditions for reconciliation, namely is it peace or truth.

Dean Hollerith recalled several of his predecessors and heroes in his statement, but one predecessor in his pulpit not mentioned was Dr King, who preached his final Sunday sermon there, and where he said;

“There is an answer to that myth. It is that time is neutral. It can be used wither constructively or destructively. And I am sorry to say this morning that I am absolutely convinced that the forces of ill will in our nation, the extreme rightists of our nation—the people on the wrong side—have used time much more effectively than the forces of goodwill. And it may well be that we will have to repent in this generation. Not merely for the vitriolic words and the violent actions of the bad people, but for the appalling silence and indifference of the good people who sit around and say, “Wait on time.”

Somewhere we must come to see that human progress never rolls in on the wheels of inevitability. It comes through the tireless efforts and the persistent work of dedicated individuals who are willing to be co-workers with God. And without this hard work, time itself becomes an ally of the primitive forces of social stagnation. So we must help time and realize that the time is always ripe to do right.”

The Dean’s Statement

As the new Dean of Washington National Cathedral, I have seen firsthand the Cathedral’s singular ability to draw the nation’s attention to an issue or a cause. Many of my predecessors harnessed the power of the Cathedral during important moments in our country’s history. Dean Francis Sayre, for one, set the standard with his vocal opposition to poverty, segregation and the war in Vietnam. Bishop John Walker, a personal hero of mine, led the way in the fight against apartheid and racial injustice.

I have stepped into this position during a very polarized moment in our nation’s history. The 2016 election divided our country in a way that I have never seen in my lifetime, and its aftermath has only deepened those divisions. Many people in our country are angered by the exclusionary and divisive rhetoric that too often surrounds the incoming administration. I understand that anger; indeed, I have felt it myself. At the same time, I also understand that many good people across this country voted for the President-elect out of a deep sense that the American dream has passed them by.

My job as a priest, and God’s call to us as a Cathedral church, is to join with others to work for justice and to proclaim the reconciling love of Jesus Christ. Our loving faithfulness to God and one another can play an important role in creating a context in which to build a more civil society.

As I think about how to expand on the legacy of my predecessors, I want us to help build bridges between the divided parts of our nation. In fact, the first time I stood in the Canterbury Pulpit last August, the text for the day was Isaiah’s call to be “repairers of the breach.” In that sermon I said: “As the body of Christ, as the hands and feet of Christ in the world, we are to be repairers of the breach in everything we do. We are to be healers, reconcilers, peacemakers, seekers of justice, and builders of bridges between people, races, and religions.” Washington National Cathedral is perfectly positioned for this kind of work, and I believe we can serve as a model for others on how we might come back together as a country.

I understand the strong disagreement many people have with the decisions to accept an invitation for the Cathedral choir to sing at the Inauguration and for the Cathedral to host the Inaugural Prayer Service. I am sorry those decisions have caused such turmoil and pain. Yet I stand by those decisions — not because we are celebrating the President-elect, but because we want to model for him, and the rest of the country, an approach to civility.

Understand that civility does not mean endorsing a president’s views, behavior or rhetoric, nor compromising our own Christian values. Our willingness to pray and sing with everyone today does not mean we won’t join with others in protest tomorrow. We will always strive to bridge the divide and repair the breaches in our life together. As a Cathedral, we have decided that we will approach this moment as open-handedly as possible.

In this and in all disagreements, we should never turn away from the opportunity to engage in any conversation. We can have no conversation, and this Cathedral can have no convening authority, if those with whom we disagree only see a turned back or are met with condescension or derision. God meets us where we are, and we must do the same for one another.

At the Inauguration on Friday, our choir will sing “God Bless America,” among other pieces, not as a political endorsement, but as an affirmation that we are still one nation under God. Why are we going? For the same reasons Hillary Clinton, George W. Bush, Jimmy Carter and others are going: to honor our nation, to support our democracy, to promote the peaceful transition of power, to celebrate our aspirations and to lift up the values that have blessed this nation.

Let me be clear: We are not singing for the President. We are singing for God because that is what church choirs do, and we are singing for our country because that is what this Cathedral does at important moments in our national life. More importantly, we are engaged in this Inauguration to remind people, if even in a modest way, that God’s reconciling love is present and at work during this time of deep division and anxiety. How desperately we all need to be reminded of the God who loves every single one of us.

The very next day, the President will come to the Cathedral for an interfaith service of prayer, music and scripture readings from a variety of sacred texts. Like previous inaugural prayer services, it is designed to reflect the diversity of our nation and to remind the President as he sets out on his job that he is called to lead all of us, not just a narrow few.

I believe our job is to work together to build a country where everyone feels welcome, everyone feels safe, everyone feels at home. We will need all people from across our nation to be a part of that process, and we cannot retreat into our separate quarters if we have any hope of accomplishing this task. We must meet in the middle, and we start through prayer and song.

It pains me that our decisions have caused such anguish. But, if these gestures serve as a catalyst for bridging the divide then, God willing, we are on the right path.

— The Very Rev. Randolph “Randy” Marshall Hollerith

Dean, Washington National Cathedral


Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Philip B. Spivey

Very gratified to see Bishop Budde sans mitre today and on the altar, a great absence of TEC heavy hitters. Optics do matter. Thank you.

Susan Moritz

Mr Seitz: “They have agreed to things being requested and to invitations issued.” “Bingo!” as you say. That is exactly what the “chatter” on this blog is about. The Episcopal Church was not “strong-armed.” It has made very poor choices.

Mr Spivey: The CNN report about Pastor Jeffress preaching at St John’s was not “fake news.” It happened. See the updated story cited above.

Prof Christopher Seitz

I do think it is important to realize that no one is strong-arming TCE churches/cathedrals. They have agreed to things being requested and to invitations issued.

Philip B. Spivey

Bingo, professor! That’s just the point.

Prof Christopher Seitz

I’m glad you got it.

There is a lot of chatter of this blog that might suggest TEC is just a victim of Trump and his people and his evil ideology. TEC isn’t required to do anything.

As I have said, if you insinuate yourself into a role of “National Cathedral” you may find that this creates special challenges. Voilà

The Rev. Stuart E. Schadt

Jeffress preaching seems to be true. This is a dark day in the Episcopal Church’s story. I still say the primary objection to the choir singing is the inclusion of the children who are asked by the cathedral and I assume their parents to stand for something whose implications will be questioned for years to come.
I would also note that the cathedral hosted a protest concert the night before the second inaugural of Richard Nixon. We have sometimes stood up with prophetic voices.

Prof Christopher Seitz

Never thought of Louis Leon as a conservative!

Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café