Support the Café

Search our Site

Michigan’s immoral “moral exception”

Michigan’s immoral “moral exception”

In Michigan, bullying is immoral, dangerous and wrong. Except when the bully thinks God is on his side and the victim is gay.

Michigan’s anti-bullying law prohibits bullying except when the person doing the bullying is acting on a “sincerely held religious belief or moral conviction.” The bill also does not specifically prohibut bullying based on “race, gender, sexual preference, etc.” Given the fact that the bill is named for a young man who committed suicide after an incident of anti-gay bullying in 2002, this is appalling.

Talking Points Memo:

SB 137, also called “Matt’s Safe School Law” after 14-year old Matt Eppling who committed suicide in 2002 after being bullied, was approved in the state Senate by a 26-11 party line vote, and will now head to the House.

The bill lays out what exactly constitutes bullying, but in one key part it says that the legislation does not prohibit First Amendment rights, and “does not prohibit a statement of a sincerely held religious belief or moral conviction of a school employee, school volunteer, pupil, or a pupil’s parent or guardian.”

The Detroit News reports that Senate Dems tried to add language that would specifically prohibit bullying on the basis of race, gender, sexual preference, etc., but were unsuccessful.

“I am ashamed that this could be Michigan’s bill on anti-bullying when in fact it is a ‘bullying is OK in Michigan law,’” Kevin Eppling, the father of the bill’s namesake, said in a letter.

Senate Minority Leader Gretchen Whitmer (D) called the final version of the bill a “blueprint for bullying” in a floor speech. “Here today you claim to be protecting kids and you’re actually putting them in more danger.”

Watch Senate Minority Leader Gretchen Whitmer explain her “no” vote.


Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Gregory Orloff

The Nazis and the Ku Klux Klan had, at least in their own eyes, “sincerely held religious beliefs or moral convictions.” Does that excuse the bullying (and worse) they did? Of course not. This law is bogus. Religion and morality never can be justification for intimidating and hurting other human beings. To think so is not in accord with Christ Jesus.

Lois Keen

So I wonder, do those who wanted people with

“sincerely held religious belief or moral conviction” to be exempt from this law realize they have, in fact, enshrined in law that people with “sincerely held religious belief or moral conviction” are bullies?

Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café