Support the Café
Search our site

Methodist bishop of Rev. Schaefer seems conflicted

Methodist bishop of Rev. Schaefer seems conflicted

The Washington Post’s Michelle Boorstein demonstrates the conflict and challenge Bishop Peggy A. Johnson of the Eastern Pennsylvania and Peninsula-Deleware Conferences is facing concerning the suspension of The Rev, Frank Schaefer, who presided at his son’s same-sex wedding. From her article:

Schaefer’s bishop released a statement Monday that seemed empathetic to Schaefer’s characterization of the Book of Discipline.

“Several statements in our Book of Discipline are discriminatory (forbidding ordination of homosexual persons, forbidding the performing of same-gender marriages and considering the practice of homosexuality incompatible with Christian teaching). There appear to be contradictions between the many affirming statements (mentioned earlier) and these statements. This has led to confusion by many from the outside of the church wondering how we can talk out of two sides of our mouth,”

Later, she posted a revised statement statement on her blog:

“Several statements in our Book of Discipline may seem discriminatory if construed as prohibitions against persons rather than practices that the church has found objectionable. Some may see these prohibitions as contradictory to the many affirming statements about the rights and sanctity of all people. The Discipline is intended to be clear and fair, although admittedly, it is not a perfect document.”

The second statement also changed the language around her views on church trials. The statement said:

“Church trials around the chargeable offenses that relate to the LGTB community are not helpful. They use time, resources, and energy that could be better used for the ministry of the church. I will continue to try in every way, as far as it depends on me, to not have church trials.”

On her blog Johnson wrote essentially the same thing, but added this final clause: “but as a bishop of the church, I must uphold my vow to follow the due process mandated by our Book of Discipline.”

That post was removed Tuesday, with the Bishop office expressing her regret with the revised version, letting her first version stand.

Links to the two versions, along with Rev. Schaefer’s reaction, can be found in Boorstein’s article.

Dislike (0)
0 0 vote
Article Rating
Facebooktwitterpinterestlinkedinmail

Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

2 Comments
Newest
Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jeff Lipschultz

Bishop Epting, every branch of the church has some leaders who seek to suppress the dissenters that they are too afraid to debate. Rome has struggled with this, but so have we all.

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
Chris Epting

Wow, and we thought the Roman Catholic Church was the one which often uses power to quench dissent.

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
Facebooktwitterrss
Support the Café
Past Posts
2020_001

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café