Support the Café
Search our site

Meat v. Carbs

Meat v. Carbs

Monday, October 7, 2013 — Week of Proper 22, Year One

[Go to Mission St Clare for an online version of the Daily Office including today’s scripture readings.]

Today’s Readings for the Daily Office:

Psalms 106:1-18 (morning) // 106:19-48 (evening)

2 Kings 21:1-18

1 Corinthians 10:14-11:1

Matthew 8:28-34

Our second reading is giving me a lot to chew on with my breakfast of fruit, nuts, and rolled oats. At least I’m not having any meat! I would have to put down my fork and ponder whether it was ethical to proceed. Of course, the factors in a Corinthian Christian’s decision to eat meat are quite different than the circumstances that we usually consider today.

To guide his audience in their decisions about eating meat, Paul lays out a series of opposing arguments.

Anti-Meat: Buying and eating meat in Corinth implies that you are “partners with demons.” The meat available in the marketplace has usually been sacrificed to idols. Best to refrain from consuming it.

Pro-Meat: On the other hand, every created good (including meat) belongs first and foremost to God, so Christians should feel free to partake. “Eat whatever is sold in the meat market without raising any question on the ground of conscience.”

So far, the Corinthian meat controversy seems like a classic debate between people with scrupulous consciences and people who take greater latitude with the freedom they experience in God. But this conflict moves beyond “conservative” and “liberal” positions.

Pro-Meat: If you’re a guest in someone’s home, you should simply eat whatever is set before you. The rules of hospitality trump the objections of your personal conscience.

Anti-Meat: If someone tells you that the meat a host serves has been sacrificed to idols, don’t eat it. Respect for someone else’s sincerely-held principles trumps the rules of hospitality.

With these two arguments, Paul tries to move his community beyond an impasse of meat-eaters and abstainers. He asks those who refrain from eating meat on grounds of conscience to compromise their principles: “eat whatever is set before you without raising any question on the ground of conscience.” And he asks those who usually eat meat to restrain some of their gospel-given freedom in the presence of people who might take offense.

Ultimately, Paul’s goal is not to build a Corinthian church that is of one mind when it comes to eating meat. Rather, his goal is to nurture a community of faith that shares in the body and blood of Christ: “Because there is one bread, we who are many are one body, for we all partake of the one bread.”

Today might present you with circumstances in which you have to compromise some principles that your conscience holds dear. You might also face circumstances when you hold back from embracing some freedom out of humble respect for someone else’s point of view. Welcome to the complicated ethical marketplace!

What wonderful preparation, though, for taking our place each Sunday not in a community that does or doesn’t eat meat together, but in a community that breaks bread.

Lora Walsh blogs about taking risks and seeking grace at A Daily Scandal. She serves as curate of Grace Episcopal Church in Siloam Springs and as director of the Ark Fellows, an Episcopal Service Corps program sponsored by St. Paul’s in Fayetteville, Arkansas.

Facebooktwitterpinterestlinkedinmail

Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

Facebooktwitterrss
Support the Café
Past Posts
2020_012
2020_013_B
2020_013_A
2020_011

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café