Support the Café
Search our site

Marriage Equality and the Supreme Court

Marriage Equality and the Supreme Court

Daniel Politi of Slate asks whether marriage equality advocates should root for the Supreme Court to take a marriage equality case. He writes:

The justices may decide this week whether to hear an appeal from those that defend California’s proposition 8, the 2008 initiative against marriage equality, reports the Los Angeles Times. On Friday, justices could also decide if they’ll hear a case on whether legally married gay couples have a right to equal benefits under the law.

Considering that appeals courts have already struck down parts of the Defense of Marriage Act that denies couples those rights, the justices seem almost certain to take up one of the five cases that seek to overturn the Clinton-era regulation. “I don’t think we’ve ever had an occasion where the Supreme Court has had so many gay rights cases knocking at its door,” Lambda Legal Executive Director Jon Davidson tells the Associated Press. …

But it’s the case surrounding Proposition 8 that will decide the deeper question of whether marriage equality should be the law of the land. And some gay marriage advocates insist it’s best for the justices to do nothing for now, not only because a majority might vote against marriage equality but also because it could lead to a big backlash that might turn the tide of public opinion. Even Ted Olson, one of the lawyers who led the attack against Proposition 8 is torn, notes the Los Angeles Times.

“We won the case, and if they don’t take it, our clients have won. They will be allowed to marry,” Olson said. “But if they take the case, it could lead to a broader victory.”

Dislike (0)
0 0 vote
Article Rating
Facebooktwitterpinterestlinkedinmail

Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

1 Comment
Newest
Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
tgflux

As a Californian (who doesn't want to make the Perfect the enemy of the Good), I rather selfishly hope that SCOTUS does not take up Prop8. Let it fall (via the Appeals Court) here in the Golden State, so same-sex couples here can start marrying again.

DOMA, however, is another kettle-of-stinky&bigoted-fish: SCOTUS, strike it down!!! (the portions in question, at least)

JC Fisher

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
Facebooktwitterrss
Support the Café
Past Posts
2020_001

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café