Manchester says “no” to Covenant

March 31, 2012
Nicholas Knisely

Manchester, the last Church of England diocese to vote until after Easter, has voted “no” to the Anglican Covenant. That brings the present vote total, including London’s “no” vote this week, to 25 dioceses against and 15 in favor.

Thinking Anglican has the vote totals:

“The motion in favour of the covenant was defeated in all three houses.

Bishops: 1 for / 2 against

Clergy: 15 for / 25 against

Laity: 12 for / 23 against”

There are just four more diocese to vote in April.

The Diocese of Glasgow and Galloway of The Scottish Episcopal Church held its Synod recently and had a consultation on the Covenant. A document reporting the comments of the table discussions has been posted online.

The first section, “Why do we need a Covenant” contains no support of the idea. In a quick count, of the 25 table discussion groups, 19 said they would reject the Covenant, 1 would accept it and 2 were still unsure.

0 0 vote

Article Rating

Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

2 Comments

Newest

Oldest Most Voted

Inline Feedbacks

View all comments

Melissa Holloway

April 1, 2012 8:54 pm

I believe the actual name is The Scottish Episcopal Church.

Thx Melissa, ~ed.

Nicholas Knisely

March 31, 2012 9:34 am

Interesting result btw. Informal guesses were that Manchester was going to say “yes” to the Covenant. To have that strong a “no” and have the bishops vote “no” helps me answer the question of what will happen in places that are voting after the rejection has been assured.

wpDiscuz

Support the Café

Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition. The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity. Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.