Support the Café
Search our site

Man, Movement, Machine, Monument

Man, Movement, Machine, Monument

John Ohmer, new rector at The Falls Church (Episcopal!) writes:

[Richard} Rohr [the well-known Franciscan writer] points out the “Four M’s” that happen over time to churches (and other organizations, for that matter), a pattern or cycle that goes something like this…


1) a Man or woman starts something…a leader or a pioneer sees or starts a different way of doing things. You can think Martin Luther (Lutheranism) or Steve Jobs (Apple) or of course Jesus (Christianity), but you can also think smaller: someone in your extended family, or a work colleague of yours.

If the man or woman succeeds in his or her leadership…if others begin to get caught up in the person’s mission, it becomes

2 ) a Movement. The person’s ideas spread beyond just him or her…and the idea or event become a cause; people feel they are part of something that is dynamic, creative, and purposeful, and they get involved in it, cheerfully and eagerly and with energy.

If enough people are swept up in a movement or idea for long enough, however, the movement tends to become

3) a Machine. It seems to be human nature, to mechanize – structure, organize, routinize – what up until then had been a dynamic, free, unstructured movement…to build a machine that ensures that X is done at Y time.

4) a Monument (or worse mausoleum). The machine itself – the thing or structure that flowed out of the movement – becomes the object of attention. It – the structure itself, belonging to it, participating in it – becomes the focus.

But, Ohmer says: “eventually, around those monuments, or within them, agitation levels rise, because something inside the human spirit says ‘this isn’t what we are all about!'”

He suggests that this is happening now within the Episcopal Church. What are your thoughts?

0 0 vote
Article Rating
Facebooktwitterpinterestlinkedinmail

Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

2 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jonathan Galliher

It seems to me to excessively praise being a small group. Larger groups need the organization to hold together, and when they have it together and aimed at appropriate goals they can be much more effective than smaller groups that are clearer about being a movement.

Jonathan Galliher

Leonardo Ricardo

Something inside my human spirit longs for fewer visions and versions of blame and the attempt to

justify the dividing of our brothers and sisters at Church…my spirit longs for safety at Church as we strive for equality, peace of mind, generosity, honesty (the commanded stuff as I know it)…no sense complicating basic decency by shoring up and encouraging difference=fear and hate.

Facebooktwitterrss
Support the Café
Past Posts
2020_012
2020_013_B
2020_013_A

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café