Support the Café

Search our Site

Lord Carey stands alone?

Lord Carey stands alone?

Recently George Carey, the former Archbishop of Canterbury spoke out against the bishops of the Church of England as they took a uniformly strong stand against the Welfare Reforms making their way through parliament. It’s not the first time that Carey has decided to criticize his successors, actions which appear to be unique to Lord Carey.

Giles Fraser writing in the New Statesman responds with a bit of history making the point that Carey doesn’t represent much more than his own views, and his criticism does not indicate a wider discontent.

“[The present controversy between the Prime Minister and the bishops is] a bit of a throwback to the 1980s. During that period, while Thatcherism was doing its worst and the Labour Party was lost to internal dispute, the Church of England took up the mantle of unofficial opposition to the government. Bishop David Jenkins lambasted the treatment of miners in Durham. And the Church’s Faith in the City report of 1985 shone a powerful light on urban decay and the growing gap between rich and poor.

Dismissed by Conservative politicians as Marxist propaganda, Faith in the City showed a church rightly concerned with the effect of government cuts. Mrs Thatcher hated it. Her response was to promote Carey to Lambeth in 1991. He was a man after her own heart.

This is why Carey’s attack on his fellow bishops is entirely predictable. His outlook comes straight from the Thatcherite self-help handbook. But in the current Church of England, he represents a very limited constituency. Today the Church looks much as it did in the 1980s. As the government’s austerity programme targets the “undeserving poor”, the clergy are finding their voice.”

Fraser draws the conclusion finally that people who worry that the next Archbishop of Canterbury will be a more right-wing leader appointed in reaction to the present economic views of Abp. Williams are going to be disappointed. Carey is so unique among the bishops of the Church of England that there’s just no one available to reprise his role.

Speaking of Lord Carey, there’s a long article in the Telegraph today that reports on his present outspokenness, and mentions that he has a new book coming out later this week.


Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

[Won’t comment on the New Statesman, as I really don’t know anything about it]

Yes, Giles Fraser’s bias for Christ’s least-of-these is quite pronounced. I’m sure many (of the 1%) find that distressing…

JC Fisher

Dave Paisley

Giles Fraser and the New Statesman.

Such unbiased sources of commentary…

I’m shocked, shocked I tell you, that he comes to those conclusions.

Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café