Support the Café

Search our Site

Liberty U’s reputation for discrimination jeopardizes expansion

Liberty U’s reputation for discrimination jeopardizes expansion

Residents of Northfield, Massachusetts aren’t so sure they want the college founded by Jerry Falwell for a neighbor. Liberty University would like to open a satellite campus on the 217 acre campus of what was once a prep school, but at least some prospective neighbors don’t like what Liberty stands for.

G. Jeffrey McDonald has the story for The Boston Globe:

“What makes [Liberty] a really bad fit is the matter of bigotry against certain groups, [namely] gays and lesbians,’’ said Northfield resident Nancy Champoux, a retired teacher who attended the meeting. “Unless we’re all involved [in finding a good fit], it’s really unlikely this is going to work out well for anyone.’’

Liberty emerged last month as a leading contender to receive – free of charge – the campus that the Northfield Mount Hermon School sold for $100,000 in 2009 to the billionaire Green family of Oklahoma City. ….

Sunday’s meeting came on the heels of other efforts to make sure Liberty is not chosen. Last week, more than 1,000 Mount Hermon alumni petitioned the school’s board of trustees to protest the prospect of Liberty getting the campus.

In their petition, Mount Hermon alumni described Liberty as “an extremist, homophobic, and intellectually narrow institution’’ that would not honor the legacy of evangelist D.L. Moody, who built the campus as a school for girls in 1879.


Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Doug Cooper

It is fine to discriminate against a creed, but not sexual orientation?


610 CMR 2.07 covers out-of-state institution that want to award degrees in Massachusetts. There is a public hearing process, and Massachusetts specifically lists sexual orientation in its discrimination policy.

Guy Butler

Claire Carter

I expect the neighbors who don’t like Liberty’s policies will have similar concerns against the other groups being considered as “a diverse set of candidates within orthodox Christianity” is likely to share some beliefs with Liberty University.

The neighborhood is obviously gathering to try to influence the family, but from what I read of the family, they are likely to give the property to someone who shares their very conservative Christian views.

I don’t know Massachusetts laws about employment, but I do know the principles of private property ownership and separation of church and state, and I don’t understand the argument that Liberty U (or something like it) would not have first amendment protection as it is clearly a religious institution and will rely on its doctrines if its employment or what it teaches are challenged.

Bill Dilworth

Claire, you couldn’t stop an individual from moving in next door, no. That’s not what we’re talking about here, though. People can (and frequently do) object to changes in their neighborhood in a variety of ways. And if you read the article, it doesn’t seem to focus on legal challenges to Liberty’s new campus.


Because people have the right to the free exercise of their religion based on the first amendment.

Yes, Claire, that’s what they’ll say (that was my point).

But they’re not a church, they’re a university (seeking accreditation, I assume?). Can they operate that university within Massachusetts’ laws?

[I recall the recent SCOTUS decision, finding for a Lutheran School. They ruled a religion teacher was a “minister”, and hence they didn’t have to uphold the ADA towards her claim. I expect Liberty U will make similar claims re their employment policies]

Liberty U in Massachusetts is a legal “accident waiting to happen”.

JC Fisher

Also note Liberty University’s role in an on-going child-custody KIDNAPPING case.

Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café