Support the Café

Search our Site

Letter from GTS faculty to the students

Letter from GTS faculty to the students

Received via email:

Dear students,

As you know, we have announced that we are not going to teach, attend meetings, or participate in common worship until pressing issues at the Seminary are addressed. We want to assure you that we would not have taken this difficult action had our repeated attempts to resolve these matters in a collaborative fashion been successful in any way. Instead, despite many attempts at dialogue in the past year – including conversations facilitated by a professional external facilitator – the situation has deteriorated to such an extent that we have reached an impasse.

Simply put, the working environment that the Dean and President has created has become unsustainable. Moreover, the good faith with which we have communicated these dire circumstances to the Board of Trustees has not, thus far, met with an equally serious response. For example our work stoppage could be ended immediately if the Board of Trustees would commit to meeting with us for a frank discussion of these serious matters, as previously requested.

These are times of great reform in centers of theological education, including the seminaries of The Episcopal Church and The General Theological Seminary. In such times, it is all the more important that we treat one another with civility and respect, and that we work flexibly and collaboratively. For the integrity of our mission, it is also important that the leaders of our seminaries not act or speak in ways that would alienate or exclude any of our partners in ministry or indeed any of God’s children.

Unfortunately the opposite has been our experience of the leadership of our Dean and President. It is our view that that the President has repeatedly shown that he is unable to articulate sensitively and theologically the issues that are essential to the thriving of the Body of Christ in its great diversity. Moreover his failure to collaborate, or to respond to our concerns when articulated has resulted in a climate that many of us find to be fraught with conflict, fear, and anxiety. Unfortunately, it is the most vulnerable members of our community who most keenly suffer the distress caused by this environment.

When Dean Dunkle arrived little more than a year ago, we looked forward to collaborating with him to develop innovative ideas for theological education. We hoped to blend innovation with the best of the General’s proud tradition of education and formation. But we have found that we cannot have these conversations fruitfully if those with experience and expertise in theological education are not heard, and their advice is ignored, and if colleagues and students feel bullied rather than empowered to contribute. This is an inhibiting environment instead of the creative collaborative environment that we so desperately need for the Seminary and for the Church.

Please know that we are not referring to off-hand remarks, or that we are overly concerned with ‘political correctness’. Rather we refer to a number of very serious incidents and patterns of behavior which have over time caused faculty, students, and staff to feel intimidated, profoundly disrespected, excluded, devalued, and helpless. In short, we find ourselves in an emotionally charged climate that regularly interferes with our current work of teaching and learning together for the sake of God’s Church not to mention our ability to envision and plan for our future. Our concerns about these behaviors and their consequences have been dismissed by the Dean. We find that the Dean’s unwillingness to take responsibility for the damage that these ways of acting and speaking have caused is deeply problematic.

As Dr. Martin Luther King Jnr. wrote in his Letter from the Birmingham Jail, “You may well ask ‘Why direct action, why sit-ins, marches, and so forth? Isn’t negotiation a better path?’ You are exactly right in your call for negotiation. Indeed, this is the purpose of direct action. Non-violent direct action seeks to create such a crisis and establish such creative tension that a community that has consistently refused to negotiate is forced to confront the issue. It seeks so to dramatize the issue that it can no longer be ignored.” Our choice for direct action, while extremely difficult for all of us – faculty, students, and staff alike – is a sincere attempt to promote a kind of creative tension for the Seminary community. Far from being immature or dysfunctional, by our action, we hope to “dramatize” issues that we feel can no longer be ignored.

Please continue to pray for us, in our urgent call for negotiation.


Professor Joshua Davis

Professor Mitties DeChamplain

Professor Deirdre Good

Professor David Hurd

Professor Andrew Irving

Professor Andrew Kadel

Professor Amy Lamborn

Professor Patrick Malloy


Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Chris H.

Considering the financial mess at GTS, the failed property upgrades and sales, and the shrinking student numbers, the failures have been building for quite a while. With the drastic changes the Dean made to worship, etc. seems board probably hired him and said something like, “We don’t care what it takes, change it; The church is changing and we need to catch up because we’re already dying.”

Prayers especially for the students as I was also stuck in a Faculty/Dean war.

Chris Harwood

Gregory Sakal

I was completely unaware until yesterday, of the situation at General. A friend who is a GTS grad posted a lament on FB which eventually led me here. It is as if the deans of EDS in Cambridge (my alma mater) and GTS are collaborating in an effort to destroy theological education in the Episcopal church.

EDS is in terrible shape. Three faculty members have left to take other jobs, and I’m told that the incoming class across all degree programs this year included only nine souls.

Does GTS want to follow EDS right down the drain?

Bob McCloskey

Thank you John Wall. You are spot on! GTS current dean has no such credentials other than being an alumni/ae. The prior provisional Dean and financial whiz kid had never even matriculated in an Episcopal seminary. Seems we don’t learn our lessons very well.

John N Wall

The problem here is not a North/South cultural mismatch, but a failure on this Dean’s part to understand academic culture. As a priest with 40 years’ experience in an academic institution, I know that academic culture is at heart collaborative, requiring trust and communication between faculty and administration. Administrators who believe they can run roughshod over the faculty are courting the kind of disasters we see at EDS and at General. In both cases, it seems, Boards of Trustees have forgotten that their responsibility is for the health and well-being of the institution, not the job security of the dean.

Academic culture is pretty much the same everywhere. I remember years ago at EDS Harvey Guthrie — a wise Dean if ever there was one — told us he never forgot that as Dean he served at the pleasure of the Board, but as a member of the faculty he had tenure.

Murdoch Matthew

This question of regional bias. It’s not a matter of values but of style — more “Turn that frown upside down” vs “What are you grinning at?” Of course there are progressive Episcopalians and parishes in the South, and hide-bound and regressive ones in the North, but attitudes that seem natural and given differ between communities. These differences must be navigated, but often they aren’t recognized. The other seems simply perverse.

And as far as not maligning the South, Dunkle’s former diocese does not in fact recognize gay equality.

Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café