Support the Café

Search our Site

Last year’s top stories from The Lead

Last year’s top stories from The Lead

Presiding Bishop Katharine Jefferts Schori’s role in accepting a former Catholic monk who had sexually abused children into the Episcopal Church was far and away the most closely followed news story on Episcopal Cafe in 2011.

The first, second and fourth most viewed news stories on The Lead, the Café’s news blog, dealt with aspects of the case of Bede Parry, whom Jefferts Schori had accepted into the Episcopal priesthood while she was Bishop of Nevada. The level of interest in the story, and its longevity, stemmed from the presiding bishop’s unwillingness to release a statement on how much she knew about Parry’s past for five months after the story first broke in June.

The Cafe published 12 items on the controversy, and more than half would be in our Top 25 list if we were to produce one. (But we are only going up to 10, because being a church geek does not lengthen one’s life.)

The third most widely read story on The Lead detailed disciplinary charges filed against Bishop Mark Lawrence of South Carolina. Those charges were later dismissed, but not before a few stories about the odd goings on in that diocese, as it attempts to distance itself from the Episcopal Church while remaining a member diocese, also figured in the Top 25.

Property disputes between the Episcopal Church and anti-gay breakaway movements continued to spin off closely monitored stories. The summary judgement won by the Episcopal Church against former Bishop Jack Iker in the Diocese of Fort Worth was the fifth most popular story on the The Lead last year.

Surprisingly, to me anyway, the story announcing that Holy Women and Holy Men was available online our sixth most widely read story on The Lead in 2011.

Bishop George Packard’s arrest during the showdown between Occupy Wall Street and Trinity Wall Street had the seventh highest readership, and several other “Occupy v. Trinity” stories figured in the Top 25.

The lengths to which Rowan Williams and John Sentamu went to keep a gay Cathedral dean, Jeffrey John from becoming the Bishop of Southwark were detailed in a memo by the late Dean Colin Slee, which led to the eighth most widely read item on The Lead this year.

Ninth was a story asking how progressive Christians should regard Jim Wallis, given his movement’s unwillingness to take a clear stand in favor of LGBT rights.

The tenth most popular story on The Lead was a brief item I popped up late one Monday evening a couple of months ago, noting that there aren’t nearly as many Episcopalians as there used to be and wondering if we ought to try to do something about that. It was also among the items that drew that most comment.

Several other issues received wide readership, but did not produce an individual story that cracked the top ten. Those included Executive Council’s recommendation that the Episcopal Church not sign the Anglican Covenant, Bishop Mariann Budde’s election and subsequent installation in the Diocese of Washington, and Bishop Stacy Sauls’ presentation regard the restructuring of church governance.

Among the significant developments that did not generate items of wide readership were the brave stand that some of our bishops have taken against pointlessly punitive immigration legislation, and the churchwide consultation about rites from same-gender blessings held by the Standing Commission on Liturgy and Music in Atlanta. I suspect, that the recommendations of that commission will generate greater readership as General Convention draws near.

The launch, just a few days ago, of a vastly improved website at, was a development whose significance will come into focus in the months ahead.

Reflecting on these ranks, I am aware that there is a certain type of “inside baseball” story that always seems to draw readership, in part because you, our beloved readers, tend to be deeply involved in the church, in part because we at the Cafe are sometimes well-positioned to report this type of story without having to give up our day jobs, and in part because there is the requisite dollop of controversy to make things interesting.

My sense, increasingly, is that these type of stories need to take a backseat to stories that point a way forward. The popularity (#10) of that small item about the decline in membership in our church, and the interest sparked by Bishop Budde’s willingness to look mainline decline in the eye and talk about how the church should respond, give me some hope that the attention of our church is shifting, and that perhaps, however gradually given that we are an all volunteer operation that depends heavily on aggregated items, the attention of the Cafe can shift a bit as well. The greatest danger facing our church has less to do with its stand on LGBT issues than with its quickly diminishing capacity to witness effectively on behalf of the Gospel.

I am hoping we can pay some attention to the simple issue of survival in the year ahead.

So what are your thoughts on the stories in our Top 10 list? And what significant developments didn’t produce big stories?


Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

What if we returned to a 19th century model of Eucharist once a month, with Morning Prayer on other Sundays?

Well, I’m leaving for the ELCA, for one.

For me, Eucharist (Eating Jesus) every Sunday is non-negotiable (if I had to, I’d consider lay presidency before I’d settle for MP on Sundays).

JC Fisher

* FWIW, inclusion of all the Imago Dei is my other non-negotiable (i.e., I’d never go RC or “continuing Anglican”, even for the Sacraments).

Derek Olsen

Interesting thoughts, Mary Anne.

But from my perspective, you have it backwards. Liturgy isn’t that which gets in the way of the real work of the church. Instead, liturgy is what feeds and drives it. Good liturgy–and all of its preparations which is a heck of a lot more than just “a/the priest”–is what connects us to the experience and reality of God in our midst. Our witness to the world is just that: a *witness* to the reality and the identity of the one whom we meet (and eat) in our Common Prayer.

Strong, vibrant liturgy has got to be central to what we do. And the laity have to be invested in how and why we do it. (Speaking as a layman myself…)

Mary Anne Chesarek

Yes, there are fewer of us than there used to be. If TEC is to survive and grow, some fundamental changes will have to take place. Change is more than debating Gregorian chant vs. Taize, or 7 weeks of Advent vs. 4. As Walter Russell Mead noted in “Get Rid of the Holy Crap,” many of us are sitting in churches we cannot afford to maintain and listening to full-time priests we struggle to pay. In order to provide the props and actors for the traditional services, we call on a precious few to fill the roster of lay ministries. I don’t see as many people leaving the church because of doctrinal differences as from sheer fatigue.

What if we all didn’t have to support a full-time priest? What if we returned to a 19th century model of Eucharist once a month, with Morning Prayer on other Sundays? What if we decided that Lay Readers can, once again, lead Morning Prayer? What if we really expected vestries to administer parish affairs (with diocesan assistance and oversight) rather than rubber-stamping the decisions made by a priest who may have no experience of management?

What if we didn’t have an Altar Guild to change the colors, scrub the wine stains out, drape the crosses, and set up the foot-washing stations? As much as I love the effect of what we do, I don’t think Jesus needed embroidered linens and elaborate paraments.

What if we worked harder to preserve small parishes and to help them grow, rather than committing millions to expensive real estate in New York City, to a lengthy General Convention, to large diocesan staffs, and to travel expenses so bishops can, yet again, apologize to the ABC for extending basic human rights to out LGBT sisters and brothers?

What if we returned to the ancient concept of locally trained priests, whose education is focused on pastoral care and preaching, not the intricacies of medieval theology and Greek? What if we admitted that academicians don’t always make good pastors?

What if we concentrated a little less on our beautiful rituals and more on feeding hungry people? What is we finally listened to the laity that we have been educating all these years through EFM, Via Media, and Bible study?

What if?

Mary Anne Chesarek

Paige Baker

Whatever happens in the year ahead, I want to thank all the staff at Episcopal Cafe for your dedication to keeping us informed and for pushing us to think and to act on behalf of our faith.

Wishing each of you a grace-filled 2012….

Elizabeth Kaeton

This won’t make news, but it’s where our attention ought to be directed:

“The greatest danger facing our church has less to do with its stand on LGBT issues than with its quickly diminishing capacity to witness effectively on behalf of the Gospel.”

Unfortunately, my sense is that The Budget will take up most of our time just before an lots of time after General Convention. It will be draped in the mantel of concern for “mission” which will never be defined with any sense of clarity or urgency, except that we’ll be told this is our number one priority and we have to “restructure” in order to do it.

I can tell you that I’m not putting my money in any vehicle that I can’t look under the hood and give the tires a good kick.

Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café