Support the Café

Search our Site

Keeping Easter alive

Keeping Easter alive

by Kaze Gadaway

Five Native young adults from eighteen to twenty-one walk somberly up the aisle to receive the sacrament. Their hands hang comfortably by their sides and they proceed confidently to kneel at the front of the altar. They act like they belong. “This is so awesome,” one of the youth whisper. “Everyone here treats us like we should be here.”

It’s been a long journey. I remember when they first came to the youth group with heads down and not looking at anything too closely. For some this is the first time being in a Church building. For others they had been burned with the ‘in your face’ evangelism. Most had someone in the older generation who had taught them something about Native spirituality. Wariness is a mild description of their general attitude. They always made sure the exits were clear if they wanted to leave. They grudgingly responded to comments and questions. Unsure of how even to sit comfortably, they squirmed constantly. One youth who was invited by a friend told me a year later that “You had a Simpson cartoon on the TV when I came in the first time and that told me that this would be different. I kept coming back because we always had fun.”

So how did they change?

Their journey evolved sometimes with the help of some caring congregations and often in spite of those who are still focusing on replicating itself for the sake of its own members. Youth are not always valued, especially when they bring something new into the milieu.

We began by transporting them to a local Church service and having a traditional youth meeting after the services. That didn’t work at all. There was no interest.

We started meeting in smaller groups in homes, parks and cafes. Every time we met we tried something new until we found what worked for us. Being retired, I was able to keep my focus and spend a lot of energy for this group of at risk, unchurched Natives living in a border town of radical poverty that treats them with abuse and disdain.

1) We connected to the Native spiritual tradition and began having Native ceremonies alongside our Christian ones.

2) We took trips outside our local toxic situation to expose them to people who did not despise them on sight and to give them alternatives to their reduced future.

3) We sent them to National youth programs that opened them up to meeting diverse ethnic groups and discovering others with whom they could talk openly about their sacred experiences.

4) We found Churches that would welcome the Native youth and began to participate in their ceremonies. There are still not that many Churches who welcome them.

5) We created our own study curriculum that combined Native, Christian and youth elements.

6) We created our own worship service based on the Episcopal service but with adaptions.

7) Relationships were created slowly with the youth and their families and promises were kept.

8) And above all we learned how to pray and to recognize the sacred in all things by reflection and spiritual exercises.

Now we have forty two Native youth who want to be a part of something larger than small town dreams. There seems to be a lot of complaints from local parishes that they are losing members and yet are not willing to spend the personal effort it takes to develop spirituality in youth.

With the trend of cutting off national programs and leaving youth formation to dioceses, I am afraid of what is going to happen to these youth when I retire in one year and six months. Dioceses don’t have extra money for youth programs. And new youth programs will not be generated simply because they are not being supplied from somewhere else. In talking with other youth ministers we realize that many do not appreciate how influential National programs have been for youth in all ethnic groups.

I am guessing that with the present direction of the Church I will have to create the plan to provide spiritual formation for these youth when I leave.

The difficulty is that I have been a volunteer for almost twelve years who had the time to establish the relationships needed for this ethnic group. Since we are not on the diocesan budget, all funds have to be raised slowly through grants, family and friends. Since we are isolated in Northern Arizona in a town of 5,000 people and with no local priest, we drive long distances for Church services or for relevant youth activities or even traditional Native ceremonies. Something new has to come into being.

Creative discussions are taking place on house churches and alternative forms of community worship. That’s all good. But how do we not lose these awesome youth that are now on a roll who need mentorship? I refuse to let them be cut loose to find their own way and be lost back to an unviable environment of poverty and addiction.

The only suggestion made to me that show promise is to pair off each of the youth with someone in the larger Church who will agree to mentor and advise the young one on their continued spiritual journey. This will most likely be done on line. Perhaps once a year we can meet for a community gathering.

Another suggestion is to find Churches in different places who will sponsor a youth and spend time with him or her and give encouragement as needed.

I don’t know what is going to happen to other youth groups who will be vulnerable by this change. If they are from rich white Churches who have the money to have programs, they will endure for a while. If they are ethnic groups in isolated situations, I fear they will die out. Without programs that push the young ones to think Globally and not be stuck in the local situation, only those with financial resources will be able to get beyond their village.

My prayer is that there will continue to be enough people in the Church who care about the youth that they will help with creative approaches to keep youth formation alive in one fashion or another.

I pray that Easter may continue to be a reality in their lives.

Kaze Gadway has worked with the emerging leaders of the Episcopal Church within the Native American community of Northern Arizona as a volunteer for eleven years. They are youth of promise from ages twelve to twenty-four. The Spirit Journey Youth is an outreach program of the Episcopal Diocese of Arizona with forty young people. She is on Facebook and blogs at infaith’s posterous


Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Benedict Varnum

I also really appreciate this story, and the work Kaze has done.

That said, I’m not sure it’s really an argument against the proposed national budget. Of the 8 points listed, only number 3 depends on something that has been run by the national church, (and that’s a trip that comes every other year, most of the cost of which still falls on local groups; there were serious questions raised at the one I attended about how the Estes Park location makes it more expensive for those farther away).

In contrast, the other numbers are all things run by the passion of a local volunteer. This seems completely in line with the subsidiarity principle of organizations (that you run programming and resolve challenges at the lowest competent level).

She voices some worry that when she leaves, the program will fail. I can appreciate that things change in a context that actually has scarce resources, rather than a scarcity mentality about using their actual resources. But programs that are built on a requirement that the same leader continue operating in the same way are dangerously close to co-dependent, and they tend to ask the larger structures in the system not to change either.

If the youth would stop attending if someone other than Kaze were their volunteer, then it’s worth asking the question of whether their relationship is with Jesus and one another, or with Kaze (it seems that Kaze has done a good job of the former).

On the other hand, if no other volunteer can be drawn in to share a passion for helping these youth find paths beyond their context, I’m not sure that having the national church spend money is the solution. If there’s no volunteer, it doesn’t matter if there’s a Gather event for them to attend. If there IS a volunteer, then you’ve got point 1, 2, and 4-8 (along with whatever 9-??? the new volunteer can add to the existing ministry).

Meanwhile, the national church NEEDS to shrink the budget. Cutting “formation for seminarians” means something like $200,000; this would fund 4-6 seminarians a year; the year I took the General Ordination Exams, there were something like 240 of us. So the national church hasn’t been the major source of formation funding for seminarians. (I haven’t seen clarity about how that funding is managed; is it intended to increase diversity by stipending minority scholars? Does it defray costs in smaller amounts? Can we imagine that the potential clergy we intend to help us run stewardship campaigns may need to do some creative funding of our own educations?).

Similarly, while Gather and EYE are strong events, my experience in attending the Gather I helped out at was that young people mostly stayed in the groups they came with. I saw much more interconnectedness at the (volunteer and diocesan-staff coordinated) Province V meetings; some of those students (perhaps because of geographic opportunity) visited one another for months and years afterwards.

Wanting to help groups find paths beyond their origin is a fantastic goal for ministry, well-founded in theology and human development theories. But I don’t think that a nationally-funded path to Estes Park (the student costs of which still fall largely on local parishes and dioceses) is the only way to do that. Our ministry can be more creative than an insistence that our national budget has to stay the way it was in spite of the facts of lowered church giving and (most concerning) the fact that dioceses aren’t likely to be able to meet even the amount requested in the proposed budget.

A Facebook User

Kaze, God bless you for what you are doing – although I suspect you get as much out of it as do your young people. I agree whole-heartedly and am working with forma to protest the funding cuts; but that’s not enough. Our church has a thriving youth program and I know that if there was a way to get our kids and your kids together, incredible things would happen. Not sure how, though I’m sure there’s a way. Pittsburgh, PA is a long way from AZ, but let’s think and pray on this one. I’ll send you a facebook friend request so we can talk.

Lisa Brown

St. Paul’s Episcopal Church

Pittsburgh PA

Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café