Support the Café
Search our site

Just Terrorism?

Just Terrorism?

For centuries, Christians have supported “Just War” theory. But what about “Just Terrorism?” Giles Fraser explores this question in his weekly column from the London Guardian:

I am eating aubergines and flatbread with Dr Samah Jabr in a cool Palestinian cafe in Stoke Newington. A psychiatrist and psychotherapist who works out of East Jerusalem, Dr Jabr is quietly spoken, modest, and perhaps just a little bit shocked by my lapses into overly colourful language. She is an educated, middle-class Palestinian (in no way a rabble-rouser) but she insists that the word terrorist has become a powerful – though often un-thought-through – political pejorative employed to discredit legitimate resistance to the violence of occupation.

What some would call terrorism, she would call a moral duty. She gives me her paper on the subject. “Why is the word ‘terrorist’ so readily applied to individuals or groups who use homemade bombs, but not to states using nuclear and other internationally proscribed weapons to ensure submission to the oppressor?” she asks. She insists that violent resistance must be used in defence and as a last resort. And that it is important to distinguish between civilian and military targets. “The American media call our search for freedom ‘terrorism’,” she complains, “despite the fact that the right to self-determination by armed struggle is permissible under the UN charter’s article 51, concerning self-defence.”…

Indeed, so much of our modern political theory about the role and limits of the state was established by the political theology of the 16th and 17th centuries – and by those who would be branded terrorists under this country’s current terrorist legislation. Oliver Cromwell, for instance, would almost certainly be a terrorist. Come to think of it, so too would Moses and his famous (and very violent) run-in with the Egyptian state. And both of these were “religiously inspired”. If we can have just war, why not just terrorism?

For Fraser’s full column please visit the London Guardian here.

Dislike (0)
0 0 vote
Article Rating
Facebooktwitterpinterestlinkedinmail

Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

3 Comments
Newest
Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Rod Gillis

@ Paul Woodrum, have you read Paul Revere's Ride by David Hackett Fischer? Great stuff, especially the sections dealing with Lexington and Concord.

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
Paul Woodrum

And let's not forget those ragtag, backwoods sharpshooters who hid behind trees and shot at neat columns of Redcoats.

The blockaded, oppressed and poor Palestinians use the means at their disposal -- tunnels, stones, and their own bodies as weapons against the sophisticated, USA supported, Israeli weapons and miltary. Who knows? Maybe someday they too will be transformed from terrorists to patriots.

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
Rod Gillis

Giles Fraser's columns are usually always thought provoking, no more so than this one, read in its entirety. The definition of terrorism is of course problematic. I've attached a link to an article from The Dept. of Justice, titled Memorializing the Victims of Terrorism. The article begins with an acknowledgement of the problem inherent in definitions.

http://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/rp-pr/cj-jp/victim/rr09_6/p3.html

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
Facebooktwitterrss
Support the Café
Past Posts
2020_001

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café