Support the Café

Search our Site

Joy: the spirituality of the 2013 Red Sox

Joy: the spirituality of the 2013 Red Sox

The Rev. Matthew Stewart. The Herald News, Fall River, MA, reflects on “The spirituality of the 2013 Red Sox:”

Back in 2004, I was still in seminary studying to become an Episcopal priest. Even though I’m from Massachusetts originally, I decided to try something new and so went to the Episcopal seminary in New York City.

And so, I was living in Manhattan when the 2004 Red Sox did their thing. The bloody sock. Dave Roberts’ steal. Manny. Papi. Pedro. Curt. The rest of The Idiots. The incomprehensible comeback over the Yankees. The four-game sweep of the Cardinals. The first Red Sox World Series championship in years and years, and the end of the Curse. Writing it all down still gives me chills. It was unreal. The morning after the Red Sox won that last game in St. Louis, when my seminary classmates went down to chapel for worship in the heart of Yankees territory, the 15-foot statue of Jesus has a Red Sox cap on. To this day, no one has admitted to being the perpetrator of that act of nonviolent resistance…

As many are noting, this year’s championship was different. Decidedly less star power. Fewer dramatic moments, Ortiz’s grand slam notwithstanding. The storyline this time around was one of good guys, average joes with an excess of facial hair, working hard and playing as a team. Now the sabermetricians would probably suggest it was good pitching not good chemistry that was the crucial component to this year’s championship. But nevertheless there was a strategic decision made by the Red Sox this year to attract a wider array of solid performers than the most expensive free agents. This was also Jesus’s MO. The women and men Jesus called to be disciples weren’t the elite of his day. (And, for the record, while women weren’t part of the “Twelve,” he did call women, too.)

Read more of 2013 Red Sox and Jesus followers here


Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café