Support the Café

Search our Site

Job’s Epiphany

Job’s Epiphany

Wednesday, September 19, 2102 — Week of Proper 19

Theodore of Tarsus, Archbishop of Canterbury, 690

[Go to for an online version of the Daily Office including today’s scripture readings.]

Today’s Readings for the Daily Office

(Book of Common Prayer, p. 985)

Psalms 72 (morning) // 119:73-96 (evening)

Job 42:1-17

Acts 16:16-24

John 12:20-26

The conclusion of Job.

Job quotes the two questions that God has spoken earlier. Then he concludes with the wonderful acknowledgment of his epiphany: “I had heard of you by the hearing of the ear, but now my eye sees you.”

Knowing God and knowing about God are vastly different things. Knowing about God is the context for vast theological disputes such as the conversations that have filled this remarkable book. But knowing God — “now my eye sees you” — moves us into awe and silence.

An innocent man suffers? Impossible, said the friends, holding on to their conventional theology. But Job clings to both sides of the dilemma with dogged tenaciousness — “God is…; and I, though innocent, suffer…” He holds the mutually incompatible in tension long enough until he experiences a transcendent truth that reconciles them. The friends know about God. But Job is willing to engage the mystery fully enough actually to know God.

Mystics from every religious tradition connect the experience of the divine — enlightenment — with various descriptions of the effect upon the self. Some describe an evaporation of the duality of self and other into an experience of the whole, a unitive experience. All mystical spiritualities posit the disillusion of any form of self-centeredness. Some call it the dismantling of the false self, others speak of the surrender of the ego or of the “I” — the self (small “s”) dissolves into the Self (large “S”), the individual knows union with God.

Yet, whenever I read this story, I am left pondering what has been lost. Does the restoration of a new family really make up for the family he has lost? Does it really make sense in the end? Is God and the universe truly just? The resignation that I experience at the end of Job doesn’t bring me the same satisfaction that it seems to bring Job.

Maybe the experience of God simply can’t be translated. It can’t be given from one person to another. We must have that experience for ourselves. It’s not enough just to talk about God. It’s not enough to know about God. Maybe we need more than to hear about Job’s encounter with the numinous. We also must be able to say, “I had heard of you by the hearing of the ear, but now my eye sees you…” Then, all else may be relative to the ultimate for us, as well as for Job.


Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café