Support the Café

Search our Site

Issues remain for deferred deportation program

Issues remain for deferred deportation program

Catholic News Service reports on the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program.

Potential applicants for the program known as Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals may be anxious to submit applications as soon as the system opens Aug. 15, but as the date approached, many issues remain unsettled.

At an Aug. 7 panel briefing, Alejandro Mayorkas, director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, which will handle most of the applications, said many specifics remain to be worked out for the program that will allow certain undocumented young people to be at least temporarily freed from the threat of deportation and get work permits. The application itself would not be available until Aug. 15.

President Barack Obama announced June 15 that effective in 60 days the Department of Homeland Security would offer the chance for undocumented people younger than age 31 to request that the government use its prosecutorial discretion to defer deportation proceedings and give them work permits.

The program, referred to as DACA, applies to young people who were brought to the U.S. before they turned 16 and who meet various other qualifications such as passing background checks, providing proof of how long they’ve been here, and proof that they are in or have completed school or military service.


In early August, Homeland Security released more details about the program, such as the types of documentation that will be accepted and answers to some questions, including the program’s cost — a total of $465 for the DACA application, fingerprinting and the application for a work permit.

But as demonstrated by questions from the audience at the Aug. 7 briefing, sponsored by the Migration Policy Institute, some things remain unclear.

The organization Dream Activist has compiled information from many organizations and posted it on One blog essay on the page written by a self-described DREAMer and law student talks about the importance of consulting with legal experts, partly to be sure there aren’t better options for legalizing someone’s status.

“First, since June 15, 2012, dozens of DREAMers have walked into our immigration law firm,” wrote the unidentified blogger. “Close to half of them actually qualify for better relief than deferred action.”

He went on to describe lawful permanent residents who didn’t know they were already legal. “We’ve had cases of people who would not qualify for deferred action but are eligible for special immigrant juvenile status, and hence, a green card. We’ve had cases of people who’ve been victims of serious crimes and persecution, who would qualify for asylum. … We even had a case of a DREAMer who was actually a U.S. citizen because his dad had naturalized as a minor — he just did not know that he automatically became a U.S. citizen.”

And United We Dream has on its site list of local town hall meetings around the country where potential applicants can get answers to their questions.


Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

1 Comment
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
David O'Rourke

One question I have about this program, if Mitt Romney wins the election, can his administration simply cancel this program, and if so, what happens to everyone who has applied for and received a deferment?

Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café