Support the Café

Search our Site

Is using Twitter a religious act?

Is using Twitter a religious act?

Timothy K. Morgan, who has been doing research on the uses of social media to memorialize the dead, asks and answers a provocative question: “Is using Twitter a religious act? I’m convinced it can be.”

Our research on Sandy Hook indicates that following a national tragedy, social media creates new possibilities for religious practice, allowing us to directly access firsthand accounts and to express our faith and solidarity in the face of unimaginable suffering from essentially anywhere on the globe. We found that Twitter provides us a place both to offer condolences and compassion to those who have been directly impacted and to make meaning of such events for ourselves.

For example, in the wake of Sandy Hook, the hashtag #nowords, which began as a social commentary on the ridiculousness of the Internet, took on a more solemn and profound sensibility. Indeed, many of us did not have the words to make any sense of it. ….

When we compared tweets about Newtown, we found that tweets designated as prayer used photos and graphics 50 percent more than general condolences. These included photo memorialization of the victims, photos of prayer vigils and other images filled with religious significance. Twitter and smartphones provided an unanticipated and soul-stirring alternative to conventional words of prayer, inviting us to forgo language altogether and bring the poetry of silence to our contemporary religious practices.”

How do Morgan’s conclusions square with your own experience of using social media during a time of either personal or national crisis?


Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ted Garvin

Anything can be a religious act (what you honor may vary). Speech, that most marvelous of gifts, can be, by its presence or absence, can be religious.

You just have to be responsible.


Why not? Ms. Glover says in her recent book on social networking, “Virtual relationships are real relationship, but they are different kind of relationships.” It seems to me that if you decide what kind of relationship you want your virtual relationships to be, and keep your tweets consistent with that, you should be okay. Always be appropriate. Mary Morrison

Like anything else, I think “tweeting’ can be a religious act, especially if it is seen as being done in community (the “twitterverse”, as it were). Acknowledging God and others in the context of one’s life can be as profound as hours of prayer with others in a sanctuary or minutes of conversation via the Internet.

Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café