Support the Café
Search our site

Is it time to repeal the death penalty?

Is it time to repeal the death penalty?

Sally Kohn argues that the botched execution of Clayton Lockett in Oklahoma on Tuesday night should persuade Americans once and for all that the death penalty is immoral and unfair.

Here is an excerpt of her column from Vanity Fair:

According to a study reported in the Daily Beast, 3 percent of all executions between 1890 and 2010 were botched in one way or another: “from the slow strangulations and decapitations that occasionally occurred during hangings to the smoke and burning flesh of the electric chair to the agonizing death throes of those strapped to gurneys in lethal injection chambers.” Lethal injections in particular are more prone to errors—at least 7 percent do not go as planned.

And yet even if executions take place precisely as intended, we have to ask ourselves as a country not only whether those convicted of crimes deserve to die, but whether the state deserves the power to kill.

As is, the state is extremely sloppy with its criminal justice authority in general. The United States Sentencing Commission found that even when convicted of similar crimes, black men receive sentences almost 20 percent longer than white men. Other studies show that being a black defendant convicted of murdering a white victim dramatically increases the odds of being sentenced to death. While one-half of all murder victims are white, 80 percent of capital-sentencing cases involve white victims. In North Carolina, a defendant accused of killing a white person is three times more likely to be sentenced to die than a defendant accused of killing a black person. In Louisiana, the odds of receiving a death sentence are 97 percent higher in cases involving white victims than black victims. Meanwhile, African Americans are disproportionately sentenced to death row—that is, in a greater proportion than the percentage of crime for which they’re responsible.

Is she right?

Dislike (0)
Facebooktwitterpinterestlinkedinmail

Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

Facebooktwitterrss
Support the Café
Past Posts
2020_001

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café