Support the Café
Search our site

Inter-Anglican body asks Anglican Church in Canada to halt changes on marriage canons

Inter-Anglican body asks Anglican Church in Canada to halt changes on marriage canons

An inter-Anglican commission on faith, order and unity has advised the Anglican Church in Canada not to change their canons to allow for same sex marriage.

The Inter-Anglican Standing Commission on Unity, Faith and Order (IASCUFO) has urged the Anglican Church of Canada not to amend its marriage canon (church law) to allow the marriage of same-sex couples, saying such a move would “cause great distress for the Communion as a whole, and for its ecumenical relationships.”

The 2013 General Synod enacted Resolution C003, asked the Council of General Synod (CoGS)—the governing body between General Synods (equivalent to our Executive Council)—to prepare and present at the next triennial meeting in 2016 a motion to change Canon 21 “to allow the marriage of same-sex couples in the same way as opposite-sex couples.” This motion would also include “a conscience clause so that no member of the clergy, bishop, congregation or diocese should be constrained to participate in or authorize such marriages against the dictates of their conscience.” The marriage commission has been inviting comment on the proposal during this time.

According the Anglican Journal, “If the 2016 General Synod decides to approve a motion to change the marriage canon, the Anglican Church of Canada will become the first province in the Anglican Communion to allow same-sex marriage. The Episcopal Church, which in 2012 authorized “for trial use” a liturgy for blessing same-sex relationships, has no provision for same-sex marriage.”

The Anglican Church of Canada has the prerogative “to address issues appropriate to its context,” the IASCUFO said, but it noted the ramifications of “a change of this magnitude” for the Communion and its ecumenical partners. In a letter addressed to Canon Robert Falby, chair of the marriage canon commission, IASCUFO members said they were unanimous “in urging you not to move beyond your present policy of ‘local option,’ ” which allows dioceses to choose whether or not they will offer same-sex blessings. They noted that the absence of a General Synod decision about the blessing of same-sex unions or same-sex marriages “has given space for the rebuilding of fragile relationships across the Communion.”

The IASCUFO’s statement came in response to a request from the Canadian church’s Commission on the Marriage Canon for an opinion about proposed changes to Canon 21 that would allow for same-sex marriages. Canon Kenneth Kearon, secretary general of the Anglican Communion, decided IASCUFO would be the “most appropriate” body within the Communion to deal with such a question.

According to Canon Alyson Barnett-Cowan, director for Unity, Faith and Order at the Communion Office, IASCUFO dealt with the request in one of its regular meetings. It gave members an opportunity to share their thoughts on the matter, which took over an hour, and then they took an extended break and returned to the question the next day, at which point people gave their responses. “The statement was created from those responses,” said Barnett-Cowan, “and we made very few changes. It went quite smoothly.”

When asked if this was the first time IASCUFO had explicitly asked a province not to do something, Barnett-Cowan said that it was, but explained that this was a somewhat “unique” situation for the commission, which is usually asked to give its opinion on more strictly ecumenical matters.

In its letter, signed by its vice-chair, Bishop Stephen Pickard, IASCUFO said that it was grateful that the Canadian church reached out and took time the time to consult with other Anglicans and ecumenical partners, noting that this shows faithfulness to the principle outlined in the proposed Anglican Covenant that churches “consult with each other before taking any step which might be considered controversial.”

It added that IASCUFO’s membership is diverse, including “some who understand why this issue has arisen within the Anglican Church of Canada and are sympathetic with the intention,” some who are in similar positions and some “for whom the question of same-sex marriage is almost incomprehensible, let alone welcome.” Regardless, the statement said that the commission members were “unanimous” in their request. Barnett-Cowan stressed this in an interview with the Anglican Journal. “People came from very different places in terms of their personal views,” she said, “but that’s not what they were asked for.”

When asked what the repercussions might be if the Anglican Church of Canada allowed same-sex marriages, Barnett-Cowan noted that in the past when such questions have come up, some provinces have been “very concerned,” and went on to say that for some, “continued relationship with the Anglican Church would be difficult.”

In 2005, primates of the Anglican Communion had asked the Anglican Church of Canada and The Episcopal Church to “voluntarily withdraw” from the Anglican Consultative Council (ACC) as a step toward restoring unity within the global church, which had been deeply fractured by the Vancouver-based diocese of New Westminster’s decision to allow same-sex blessings and The Episcopal Church’s ordination of a gay bishop in New Hampshire.

Meanwhile, Archbishop Fred Hiltz, primate of the Anglican Church of Canada, has just returned from a meeting with Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby in which the marriage commission was discussed, and in which, Hiltz said, for the sake of transparency, he provided Welby with the resolutions from General Synod and from CoGS around the proposed change to the marriage canon.

Posted by Andrew Gerns

 

0 0 vote
Article Rating
Facebooktwitterpinterestlinkedinmail

Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

36 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Rod Gillis

This interview from CBC TV ought to be mandatory viewing at the Anglican Communion Office. Its about 12 minutes long. Hopefully accessible from your viewing area.

http://www.cbc.ca/player/Shows/Shows/The%20National/About%20the%20Show/Wendy%20Mesley/ID/2508752523/

Ann Fontaine

And, David, there a note on how to unsubscribe that comes with every message to your email.

Ann Fontaine

Or below the comment box there is a “manage your subscriptions” link.

Ann Fontaine

You can log out, David, though usually the comments stop after a couple of days. Thanks everyone for participating.

Gary Paul Gilbert

Thank you, Rod, for explicating my frustration with the Anglican Communion. Yes, I engaged in hyperbole.

Not wanting to deal with institutions which discriminate is more than simply not wanting to listen to ideas with which one does not disagree.

Gary Paul Gilbert

Chaz Brooks

Is there something special about the issue of “discrimination” that makes it impossible to compromise on? Why can we tolerate difference on, say, the doctrine of the atonement, but not on sexual ethics?

Rod Gillis

You mean besides the fact that discrimination dehumanizes and demonizes people and results in harm?

Facebooktwitterrss
Support the Café
Past Posts
2020_012
2020_013_B
2020_013_A
2020_011_Reset

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café