Support the Café

Search our Site

In Mississippi, speaking out on the Personhood Amendment as it goes to the polls

In Mississippi, speaking out on the Personhood Amendment as it goes to the polls

UPDATE: the ballot measure was defeated.

Mississippi voters today went to the polls to decide whether to define legal personhood as beginning with fertilization.


Initiative 26 would define personhood as “every human being from the moment of fertilization, cloning or the functional equivalent thereof.”

Though the text of the amendment is simple, the implications if it passes couldn’t be more complex. If approved by voters, it would make it impossible to get an abortion in the state and hamper the ability to get some forms of birth control.

Because the amendment would define a fertilized egg as a person with full legal rights, it could have an impact on a woman’s ability to get the morning-after pill or birth control pills that destroy fertilized eggs.

The group Public Policy Polling found a basic toss-up on the amendment hours before the vote: 45 percent in favor, 44 percent opposed.

As fodder for the voting booth, some clergy took to the rostrum to speak out against the measure, including The Rev. Melanie Lemburg, rector of St. Peter’s-by-the-Sea, Gulfport.

“Twenty six would force victims of rape and incest to carry pregnancies caused by their criminal attackers. Twenty six would make some forms of contraceptives, our best strategy against abortion, illegal,” said [Rev. Carol] Burnett.

“This initiative applies chains of bondage to physicians who would hope to act in the best interest of their patients,” said the Rev. Lashaundra Smith, a Christian Church-Disciples of Christ leader.

The Rev. Melanie Lemburg told a powerful story about counseling a woman whose special needs daughter was raped and had to terminate her pregnancy.

“If we allow the government to be responsible for these most intimate decisions and issues, then we people of faith are giving away the opportunity to decide what may be the only merciful option in the sea of bad options,” said Lemburg, an Episcopal Church leader.

The Atlantic:

The Center for Reproductive Rights has pledged to file suit against the amendment immediately and expects the courts to issue an injunction against it because it “clearly violates the Constitution,” according to group President Nancy Northup.


Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Blessings indeed to the good people of Mississippi. Enough of them understood what this might mean, and how much harm it might do, independent of the question of “abortion on demand” (a red herring indeed!).

Marshall Scott

Initiative 26 was defeated.

Torey Lightcap


Voted down!

To which I respond, TBTG! 😀

JC Fisher

Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café