2020_010_A
Support the Café
Search our site

If you’re gay in the the CofE,
claiming celibacy may not be enough to be a bishop

If you’re gay in the the CofE,
claiming celibacy may not be enough to be a bishop

Attorneys for the Church of England say that a gay priest in a civil partnership add is living a celibate life may still not qualify for an episcopal appointment if his provincial archbishop, diocesan bishop or nominating committee is not convinced.

It is not clear what the suggested extra scrutiny would look like.


The Church Times:

The guidance says that it follows from the House of Bishops’ statement in December, that “clergy in civil partnerships who are living in accordance with the teaching of the Church on human sexuality can be considered as candidates for the episcopate.”

It goes on to say that “before a priest in a civil partnership can be considered for episcopal nomination, the archbishop of the province in which he is serving will wish to satisfy himself, following discussions between the diocesan bishop and the clergyman concerned, that his life is, and will remain, consistent with the teaching of the Church of England. . . These assurances will be sought before a candidate comes to be considered for nomination to a diocesan or suffragan see.”

But the new guidance says that assurances that a candidate is “in a non-sexually active civil partnership” may not be sufficient to guarantee a nomination to a particular bishopric. The CNC, or the diocesan bishop in the case of a suffragan appointment, would still be able to impose a requirement that a person in a civil partnership could not be put forward for the office concerned.

“Those responsible for making the nomination are entitled in law to reach a judgment on whether the fact that someone is in a civil partnership would prove an obstacle to nomination, given the strongly held religious convictions of a significant number of those worshipping members of the Church of England to whom the bishop concerned would . . . be ministering.”

According to the Church Times, the advice echoes the guidance given in cases relating to divorced clergy, where those responsible for nominations are “entitled to reach a judgment on whether marital history might prove an obstacle”.

0 0 vote
Article Rating
Facebooktwitterpinterestlinkedinmail

Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

3 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
tgflux

Conversely, Paul, if they promised to (lock&key) keep them there! O_o

JC Fisher

Paul Woodrum

Perhaps like Blessed Cranmer, they could carry their spouse around in a wicker trunk to escape detection.

Enrique Molina

First of all, I don’t think many people would want to be partnered to someone celibate, so this makes it very hard for gay clergy to find anyone. Beyond that, the major issue here is that CofE is implying that straight people have relationships, and gay people just have sex. Clearly their problem isn’t about theology; they just think gay sex is icky. Moreover, intimacy is usually a part of relationships. It’s wrong to separate who we are and what we do.

Enrique Molina

Facebooktwitterrss
Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café