Support the Café
Search our site

How movements die

How movements die

David Brooks reflects on what makes movements vital and what makes movements die. One sign of death: closing ranks in a search for purity.

Two rival reform movements arose to restore the integrity of Catholicism. Those in the first movement, the Donatists, believed the church needed to purify itself and return to its core identity.

The mission of the church, in the Donatist view, was to provide a holy alternative to a unclean world. The Donatists wanted to purge the traitors from the priesthood.

After they pruned their membership, the Donatists wanted to close ranks to create a community of committed believers. They would separate themselves from impurity, re-establish their core principles and defend them against the hostile forces.

The Donatists believed that, in those hard times, the first job was to defend Christian law so it wouldn’t be diluted by compromise. With this defensive posture, the Donatists would at least build a sturdy ark for all those who wanted to be Christian.

This Donatist tendency — to close ranks and return defensively to first principles — can be seen today whenever a movement faces a crisis. Modern-day Donatists emerge after every Republican defeat: conservatives who think the main task is to purge and purify. There are modern-day Donatists in humanities departments, who pull in as they lose relevance on campus.

You can see them in the waning union movement: people who double down on history and their self-conscious traditions. You can see them in the current Roman Catholic Church, which feels besieged in a hostile world. You can identify the modern-day Donatists because they feel history is flowing away from them, and when they gossip it’s always about intra-community rivalries that nobody outside their world could possibly care about.

0 0 vote
Article Rating
Facebooktwitterpinterestlinkedinmail

Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

4 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
June Huber

If this issue resonates with you, read Jonathan Haidt’s book “The Righteous Mind.”

Michael Russell

Donatists, Nestorians, Arians and anti Chalcedonians together outnumbered the “Orthodox”. But the orthodox, at least, rejected the narrow puritanism of the Donatists and other early groups that overemphasized purity and lost sight of restoration and forgiveness.

We have lots of Donatists today, Forward in Faith, ACNA and other denominational movements that demand their judgment of who is worthy to serve God be seen as the only opinion. They believe they hold the truth and no one else has any part in it.

tgflux

You can see them in the waning union movement: people who double down on history and their self-conscious traditions.

Just please to ignore the billionaire-funded/coordinated ASSAULT on those unions. Nice “Blame the Victim” job, Mr Brooks.

JC Fisher

A Facebook User

The problem with this argument, of course, is that the Donatists survived quite healthily alongside the Catholics in North Africa until the Muslim conquest, at which point both groups—having been limited to the Roman elites rather than including the local Berbers—virtually disappeared. The factors leading to the death of Donatism were external to the factors Brooks is discussing, and the same factors lead to the death of the Catholic Church in Africa. The Donatists, however, were limited to Africa and therefore did not survive the conquest.

[Greg Johnston added by ~ed.]

Facebooktwitterrss
Support the Café
Past Posts
2020_012
2020_013_B
2020_013_A

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café