Support the Café

Search our Site

How can we strengthen the rural church?

How can we strengthen the rural church?


by Kevin McGrane, Sr.


At this time, 25% of the parishes in my diocese are without a priest, and 40% of the parishes in the diocese cannot afford a full-time priest.  Nearly all of the rural parishes of my diocese fall into both of these categories. Most of the rural parishes of TEC are in the same boat, and are on the verge of collapse.  Very soon we will be, for all intents and purposes, an urban church.  What do we do?


It is past time for radical action, and I pose three steps we can take as a church to prevent their collapse.  They are as follows:

  1. Create ministry teams of priest-deacons-laity to serve and manage clusters of parishes.
  2. Raise up at least one deacon per parish to serve on the ministry team.
  3. Institute deacon led Sunday services in the absence of the priest, including Eucharist.


Imagine a diocese that identifies a three-parish cluster in the rural section of the diocese. Individually, they cannot support a priest; together they could support one priest to serve all three parishes. Of course, the priest could not reasonably serve all three parishes by herself. However, if each parish were to raise up a deacon – a non-stipendiary, trained, ordained clergy-person – then all three parishes could have a formal liturgy each Sunday: one led by the priest, the other two by the deacons, all on a rotating basis.


The deacon would be a part-time clergy person permanently on site at his or her parish to lend stability to the community, who is supervised by the priest.  The laity runs and manages their facilities and any neighborhood ministry they may operate, with the involvement of the deacons.


The key to this model is raising up a deacon for each parish, preferably from the parish community itself.  Raising up a deacon is quicker and far less costly than raising up a priest, and with a 50-year history of deacons in TEC, the order has an established track record of success in ministry.  It also would be easier to recruit a priest to oversee a ministry team whose soul focus is the pastoral and liturgical care of the parish cluster. If the priest knew that she is not alone in her job, but has three clergy colleagues to assist her in her vocation, she would be more willing to apply for the job. The facilities management of the parish – physical plant, budgeting, finance, et al – would be the soul responsibility of the vestry.


With the 1979 Prayer Book, celebrating the Eucharist every Sunday became normative in TEC.  This has made liturgy “priest-centric”, and painted us into a corner regarding our options on how we staff parishes and celebrate liturgy.  Prior to 1979, we has a 192 year history of celebrating  Morning Prayer Service on a Sunday, rotating with a monthly Eucharistic celebration.  Reinstituting Morning Prayer Service, led by a deacon, is in keeping with our history and tradition.  What’s more, inaugurating a Sunday Morning Prayer Service with Eucharist – a blend of Morning Prayer with distribution of previously consecrated elements of the Eucharist – would satisfy the standard set over the last 40 years regarding Eucharist, but allow the deacon to distribute Eucharist in the absence of a priest.


As with the ministry team model of staffing a parish, this concept is already in place in some diocese and operating successfully.  Deacons conduct full Sunday services with music and sermons, and in some cases distribute Eucharist consecrated by a priest upon her last visit. However, it is not seen as normative, which is the problem. It is only seen as a stop-gap measure until the problem of a shrinking priesthood is resolved.  A shortage of priests, though, is not the problem; the inability to attract a priest to a rural setting and pay them a full wage is the problem, and one that simply is not going to go away.


The radical aspect of the three step solution is to make it normative, not a temporary, stop-gap measure.  All rural and small town parishes would have at least one deacon on site, under the direction of a priest.  The priest would divide her time between the cluster parishes as she saw fit while the deacon would be the part-time clergy on site, lending stability and local pastoral care.  The congregation would enjoy consistency, stability, and be assured of a future, while the priest would enjoy a fully compensated position as “cluster rector” without the stress of trying to run three parishes at once by herself.  This model of ministry team segues nicely with the concept of the “free range priest”, as conceived and practiced by the Rev. Catherine A. Caimano (see


This model requires a shift in the attitudes of some clergy who may be uncomfortable with the model, as it may strike them as a violation of their boundaries by deacons and laity.  But, frankly, no one has come up with any other workable ideas. The alternative to doing nothing is to allow the rural parishes to die, and tell our rural brothers and sisters to commute to a new parish or go seek a new church.  We cannot sacrifice them to our notions about the role of a priest in the life of the church. We need new wineskins for new wine.



Deacon Kevin McGrane Sr. serves at St. John’s – Tower Grove, in the Diocese of MO. He has sat on several diocesan committees, including Standing Committee, Diocesan Committee, and the Board of the Episcopal School for Ministry.


image: Christ Church, Jordan, NY



Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
David O'Rourke

Based on the numbers listed, yes, rural congregations need help. However simply replacing resident priests with deacons is not the solution. Deacons are not priests nor are deacons “priests lite”, which is what this proposal advocates for. One of the problems we are having in TEC with really embracing the diaconate and making it healthy is this blurring of the lines between deacons and priests. Additionally, using deacons as unpaid labor in a part time position because a parish can’t afford a priest strikes me as exploitative.

Bold and creative solutions are needed to support rural congregations that are struggling to survive. What needs to be addressed is the nature of what it means to be a community of baptized Christians that gathers for worship and community without necessarily having a full time priest or a priest who can be there every Sunday. Lay people can be easily trained to lead Morning Prayer and to preach sermons or to invite discussion of the readings.


thank you for taking time to join the conversation, we do ask that in future you include your first and last name – thx, editor

Three unpaid positions with substantial responsibilities does not seem like an ethical model. Three people would effectively be in charge of a church, with all the work that entails, and would be unpaid. I understand the nonstipendiary deacon model is common, but not with this kind of work, I don’t think. I’d want our church to do better by its clergy.

Thomas Rightmyer

A number of dioceses have adopted and adapted the Total Ministry plan initiated by Bishop Gordon of Alaska. A group of trained volunteers share leadership of the parish’s ministry. Some lead in community ministry; some teach, some pastor, some preach, some celebrate the sacraments. I can appreciate Deacon McGrane’s concern, but I think Total Ministry is a better strategy than the one he proposes. And our ecumenical agreements with the ELCA and the Moravian Church offer opportunities for shared ministry. I recently finished a time as rector and pastor of the Lutheran Episcopal Church of the Savior in Newland, Avery County, in western North Carolina, which has served its community for over 35 years. Ecumenical ministry works. Pray for the full communion proposal between the Episcopal and United Methodist churches. We are not alone!

William Stewart

Thank you Kevin.I would go a bit further and say that it would make sense that Licensed Deacon plus Anglican Studies certificate should equal “Local” priest in charge. As you point out this would be a tough sell because it makes a whole new class of clergy. But as you also point out it is either that or become an “urban”church.

David O'Rourke

Then the dioceses in question should ordain them as priests. There are no requirements in the Canons that priests have an MDiv and there is the Iona model pioneered by the Diocese of Texas to raise up and train priests who will serve without pay in small rural congregations.

Elyse A. Evans Kircher

Total Common Ministry – raising non-stipendary clergy out of each parish – has been working in Washington and Nevada, too.

Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café