2020_010_A
Support the Café
Search our site

Giles Fraser looks back without anger

Giles Fraser looks back without anger

The Guardian profiles the Rev. Canon Giles Fraser, who resigned as canon chancellor at St. Paul’s Cathedral in London rather than be part of the team that assented to a once-planned, but since-dealyed police action against Occupy London.


Fraser’s response to the situation at St. Paul’s makes for an interesting compare and contrast with the events of the past weekend involving Trinity, Wall Street and Occupy Wall Street.

“This year has been a bit like cricket,” he says. “Nothing happens for a very long time and then it is all excitement – it’s a bit much. Things changed for me overnight. I had no idea it was coming.” He whips out a psychedelic iPhone and shows 60 police cars converging on St Paul’s one October night. It was 7.30pm – the evening service was at 8pm. He asked the police to let him persuade protesters to stand down peacefully. “That is when I got fitted up by the press as Wat Tyler,” he laughs. “I was just trying to facilitate access to the cathedral.”

He resigned because “I couldn’t survive at this place if we went along with an injunction to kick the protesters out”. What he said at the time was that he did not want to see “Dale Farm on the steps of St Paul’s”. His Scandinavian wife, Sally, and three children were – and are – supportive, but he is concerned for his eldest daughter, who is in her GCSE year. And he does refer to the “emotional fallout” – the “What have you done?” moments. He waves at the room we are in (the house goes with the job): “I have a lovely house… and I love St Paul’s…”

Might he have jumped the gun? “No, I had to go.” Besides, his robust action may have encouraged people to rethink the seriousness of the situation. He remains unswervingly positive about Occupy as a “new form of protest”. He characterises it as “frustratingly democratic” because when he has said to protesters “take me to your leader”, there has turned out to be no leader. And yet, as he remarks, the advantage of this is obvious: “You have to engage with the issues.”

Then there is this line: “Economic justice is the number one moral issue in the Bible.”

I am wondering how often the church acts as though it believes this.

Facebooktwitterpinterestlinkedinmail

Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

Facebooktwitterrss
Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café