General Seminary trustees release first statement on conflict

by

Via email:

Yesterday, after much prayer and deliberation and after consulting our legal council, the Executive Committee of the Board of Trustees of The General Theological Seminary voted with great regret to accept the resignations of eight members of the Seminary faculty.


The Board came to this decision with heavy hearts, but following months of internal divisions around the future direction of General Seminary, some faculty member’s demands for action not possible under the governing structure of the Seminary, and the eight faculty members’ refusal to teach, attend meetings, or even worship, it has become clear that this is the best path forward in educating our students and shaping them into leaders of the church. However, even after accepting the resignations, the Seminary is willing to meet with any former faculty member about the possibility of reconsidering the resignation.

Simultaneously, the Board of Trustees is conducting an internal investigation into certain allegations of statements made by the Dean and President. Further comment on the investigation, pending its outcome, would not help that process. We encourage everyone to withhold any further judgment or comment.

The primary concern of General Seminary continues to be the education and formation of our students. The Church is counting on us. This week Dean Dunkle and the remaining faculty are working on the best ways to continue teaching and advising and to assure all that we will continue to provide quality education and formation with the least amount of interruption possible. Our location in the heart of New York City affords us access to a wide range of resources, and we shall be drawing upon those resources to address any needs created by these resignations. We will share specifics with our students as these plans unfold.

Yesterday’s decision was not easy. For nearly 200 years, General Seminary has prepared more than 7,000 men and women as leaders in the Church. Dean Dunkle has helped that mission thrive as we advance it through the 21st century. While we may sometimes disagree, the commitment to our current students is a responsibility that the Board takes seriously. It is for their well-being alone that we came to this resolution, and pray that our decision was the right one.

The Board of Trustees

The General Theological Seminary

Dislike (0)
Facebooktwittergoogle_pluspinterestlinkedinmail
Facebooktwitterrss
Karen Johanns
Guest
Karen Johanns

As much as it pains this liberal ol' lesbian priest to say it, I can't help but notice that much of the language coming from the BoT is strikingly similar to the language that came from 815 when dealing with dissident clergy and dioceses. Have we absorbed so much of the litigiousness of the last 10 years that we have now turned it on each other?

Fire away.

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
William Hammond
Guest
William Hammond

There appears to be a website representing the viewpoint of the eight members of the faculty, where I find, in part:

BEGIN QUOTE

Dean Dunkle’s public manner of expression seriously discomforts us and diminishes the reputation of the institution. Specifically, his references to women, non-white cultures, and the LGBT community are absolutely inimical to the commitments of our church. He once described Asian transit passengers in the San Francisco Bay area as “slanty-eyed.” In a large community meeting last spring, he compared the technical side of theological education to “looking up women’s skirts.” Before several faculty members and students, he spoke, as an obvious act of intimidation, of how “black people can do such interesting things with their hair,” a comment about which students complained. On several occasions he has stated that General Seminary should not be “the gay seminary.” And he frequently stresses that the institution should emphasize “normal people.” We have consistently communicated to him that such language undercuts our practices of hospitality and inclusion of those who are gay and lesbian, people of color, those who are differently-abled, or socially non-conformist. When we have brought these matters to his attention, he often denies having made the statements despite the existence of numerous witnesses, and he refuses to acknowledge the impact his actions have on others.

END QUOTE

The website is at the URL:

http://www.safeseminary.org/

and the quoted excerpt is from

http://www.safeseminary.org/how-we-got-here.html

If these allegations are true, not only should the Dean be removed but also he should be inhibited from the exercise of ministry for at least several years.

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
Rod Gillis
Guest
Rod Gillis

Interesting story about church politics and conflict. Huff Post has a report on this under the caption, What The Hell is Going on at General Theological Seminary.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/09/30/general-theological-seminary_n_5907270.html

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
William Hammond
Guest
William Hammond

Isn't it disingenuous for the Dean and the Board to characterize the strike actions as resignations? If, in the end, eight of the eleven faculty members are removed, there is no seminary left. It's outrageous.

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
Kevin Montgomery
Guest
Kevin Montgomery

"However, even after accepting the resignations, the Seminary is willing to meet with any former faculty member about the possibility of reconsidering the resignation."

Translation: "We'll consider hiring you back on contract."

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
wpDiscuz