Support the Café

Search our Site

GAFCON publishes list of Lambeth “violators”

GAFCON publishes list of Lambeth “violators”

GAFCON UK has published a paper outlining what it describes as violations of Lambeth Resolution 1:10, in the blessing and celebration of same-gender marriages in the Church of England.

The last quarter of 2016 and the first quarter of 2017 will include meetings of the Church of England’s House of Bishops and the General Synod. Many are asking whether or not the Church of England will “hold the line” on sexuality. Unfortunately, the lines drawn by Lambeth 1.10 have already been crossed, in some cases, going as far back as 2002. This document catalogues some of the ways in which Lambeth 1.10 has been violated within the Church of England.

The document goes on to single out the Anglican Church of Canada, The Episcopal Church, and the Scottish Episcopal Church as demonstrating “a clear pattern of violations,” including blessings and ceremonies themselves, and a failure to discipline clergy for engaging in such activities. The authors then list by name members of the Church of England clergy whom they find to be in violation of Lambeth 1:10. They further complain that

Clergy and lay leaders are allowed to use their positions of leadership to advocate for the violation of Lambeth 1.10: Members of the Pilling Commission revealed an openness to considering violations of Lambeth 1.10: “…we do not all believe that the evidence of Scripture points to only one set of ethical conclusions. In short, Christians who share an equal commitment to Scripture do not agree on the implications of Scripture for same sex relationships.” (para 235). Church of England clergy openly advocate for violating Lambeth 1.10 through advocacy organizations such as Changing Attitude, Accepting Evangelicals, Diverse Church, and Synod Evangelicals for Good Disagreement.

Even the blessing of Pride parades has fallen foul of Gafcon’s list of violations.

While reaching out to the LGBT community could be an example of evangelism, the ways in which these events unfolded have been ambiguous at best and at worst are at odds with Lambeth 1.10.

The authors conclude,

While orthodox believers certainly hope that the Church of England does not go further in violating Lambeth 1.10, the situation in England as it currently stands is already a scandal within the Anglican Communion.

To restore order and a credible Christian witness, the upcoming meetings of the House of Bishops and General Synod would need to not merely avoid going further in violating Lambeth 1.10, but it would need to take constructive steps to rectify the numerous public (and presumably private) breaches that have been strategically taken by some to undermine the teaching of the Communion.

Read the full report here.

Thinking Anglicans has a round-up of news stories and reactions to the Gafcon list. One notable response has been the creation of a website dedicated to those who have been listed as violators, those the authors left out, and their supporters. The website invites individuals and parishes to add their names and messages in support of the “Lambeth 110.”



Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Christopher Smith (The Rev.)


Jeremy Bates

They know they are losing the battle.
So they are getting a bit desperate.

Marshall Scott

Copying my response at “Thinking Anglicans:”

So, someone in GAFCON is good at research. Otherwise, this is the same old same old. It begins with the false premise that Lambeth was some sort of consistory developing policy rather than an opportunity for bishops to share with one another and on that basis express opinions.

I am certainly troubled at what appears to be shaming. That said, the links show that these events were already public. It can only add to the stress, but won’t be where the stress started. Moreover, this was not written for you or I, those who understand the limitations of even Instruments of Communion. This was written to rally folks already committed.

Don’t get me wrong. This is certainly a stumbling block, one that “cries ‘Lord, Lord,’ but does not know” Jesus. We need to be sure our brothers and sisters, including those who are GLBTI, feel welcomed and safe. But this, for all its ambition and hype, is not something new.

Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café