Support the Café

Search our Site

Further taxation for the wealthy or merely sharing the burden?

Further taxation for the wealthy or merely sharing the burden?

Rev. Dr. Mariann Budde, rector of St. John’s in Minneapolis and bishop-elect to the Episcopal Diocese of Washington, shares the following thoughts on her church’s blog under the heading “Shared Sacrifice.”

As our elected leaders spend the last days of the state legislative session working around the clock to finalize budgets that will affect us all, there is considerable talk about the need for shared sacrifice in these difficult economic times. Yet I can’t help but echo a question I heard on Public Radio yesterday, on a program interviewing leaders from both political parties. A woman called to ask the politicians who refuse to consider raising taxes on the wealthiest of Minnesotans: “How are the rich being asked to sacrifice?”

Their reply, all the more disturbing for its matter-of-fact tone, was, in essence, “They’re not.” And yet the sacrifice being asked of our most vulnerable citizens, and of those who work to sustain the foundations of society upon which we all depend, is enormous.

The author and educator Parker Palmer once amended Socrates’ famous dictum that the unexamined life is not worth living to include the following: If you decide to live an unexamined life, please do not take a job that involves other people. The world suffers deeply at the hands of leaders who possess the skill and power to manipulate external reality but lack sensitivity and awareness of the cost of their actions on others.

“A leader,” Palmer writes, “is someone with the power to project either shadow or light on some part of the world and onto the lives of the people who dwell there. A leader shapes the ethos in which others must live, an ethos as light-filled as heaven or as shadowy as hell.” What kind of ethos, what shadows or light will these proposed budgets cast?

If this is indeed a time for shared sacrifice, surely those who have the least to lose can give a little more so that those with the most to lose can live. This is not a partisan debate. This a moral issue.


Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Tom Sramek, Jr.

As long as nearly half of the eligible voters sit out each election and many of those who do vote are swayed by expensive advertising campaigns, it will ever be thus.

Michael Russell

Our present Congressional leadership follows Ayn Rand with a political patina of religion iced on. This nice column from Swampland connects some of those dots:

At the heart of her philosophy is unvarnished selfishness and arrogance of and among her so called creative class. There is no place for compassion in the Randian world despite the fact that creatives are nothing without crafters

Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café