Support the Café

Search our Site

For CofE Synod, it’s decision time on women bishops

For CofE Synod, it’s decision time on women bishops

It’s coming down to the wire. Next month’s General Synod of the Church of England will spend much of its time on the question of women bishops. 42 out 44 dioceses have expressed a desire for women in the episcopate, so now comes the question of how to make it happen, and that question is hinging on the related issue of how to accommodate the minority who is against the idea. So much of the debate will focus on what is called the “Code of Practice.”

Thinking Anglican’s has a link to the Church Times article, now peeking out from behind the paywall, about what is before the Synod next month. It provides useful background for those of us watching with interest from across the ocean.

There was no doubt from the voting in the dioceses, where only two of the 44 dioceses had voted against the principle of women bishops, that the majority were in favour of women in the episcopate; so the real arguments in Synod were “not so much about when” as about how to accommodate those who could not accept women bishops.

After the Code of Practice debate on the Tuesday afternoon, there will be a take-note debate on the Wednesday morning on the Business Committee’s report on the Article 8 reference to the dioceses. At this debate, following motions passed in diocesan synods can be discussed.

The key debate is on the Wednesday afternoon, when the Synod will focus on two diocesan-synod following motions that take opposing views on whether the House of Bishops should amend the legislation in May.

A motion from Manchester dio­cesan synod requests that the Bishops amend the legislation in the way proposed by the Archbishops of Canterbury and York in 2010 (News, 9 July 2010). Their chief proposal, which the House of Clergy narrowly voted down at the time, was that the authority of a traditionalist bishop requested by a parish would derive from the Measure, and not be delegated from the diocesan bishop, who might be a woman; though without detracting from her own jurisdiction.

A motion from Southwark diocesan synod, which will be pre­sented as an amendment to the Manchester motion, takes the op­posite line. It asks the House of Bishops to note the “significant support” that the draft legislation has received from the dioceses, and make no further amendments to the legislation whatsoever.

The Synod has no power at this late stage to dictate what the House of Bishops does or does not do to the legislation, but it would be likely to take note of what Synod members request.


Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

1 Comment
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Leslie Scoopmire

The “system” outlined here seems one destined not only for chaos, but for promoting that caos for as long as possible.

Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café