Support the Café

Search our Site

Fake Good News Makes for Bad Foreign Policy

Fake Good News Makes for Bad Foreign Policy

by Bishop John Harvey Taylor


When word spread that presidential candidate Pete Buttigieg was a practicing Episcopalian, adverse reaction from some evangelicals was swift. Some said he wasn’t actually a Christian — not because he’s a married gay man, mind you, but just because he’s a practicing Episcopalian.


Most of us are used to it. Have you ever told a post-denominational friend that you’re an Episcopalian only to have them reply, “I’m a Christian”? Like the faint echo of the Big Bang in the cosmos, the anti-Catholic, anti-sacramental suspicions of the 16th century Reformation still trouble the body of Christ. With thousands of denominations and sects, ours is a rich but fractured mosaic. It’s vital to be tolerant of one another’s styles of worship and interpretations of Holy Scripture.


But when idiosyncratic beliefs put people’s lives at risk – when fake Good News ends up as bad foreign policy, as it has in the Trump administration — it’s time for progressive denominational Christians speak up on behalf of one of the greatest gifts to people of faith: Enlightened biblical scholarship.


Many insist that the Bible, especially in the Revelation of John, predicts events such as the creation of the state of Israel and Russia’s intervention in the Syrian civil war. The theories fall under the broad category of Dispensationalism. Because of the “Omen” movies and “Left Behind” novels, many in society and the media, whether believers or not, may think it’s the only way to read the good book.


But we denizens of EfM Education for Ministry, weekly Bible study in our parishes and missions, and seminary know the real sacred story. The texts themselves say nothing about these or any historical event that occurred after they were written, edited, and accepted as sacred canon in the fourth century. We know this and more thanks to analytical tools that scholars, interpreters, and teachers have had at their disposal for a century and a half or more.


The techniques are taught at all mainline seminaries and informed the preaching Buttigieg grew up hearing. They help us understand that Revelation was written late in the first century not to predict events in 2019 but to inspire and encourage churches in Asia Minor as the Roman Empire was persecuting Christians. Torah wasn’t the work of one author, Moses, but of many writers and editors, finalized seven centuries after the events the texts recount. Isaiah comprises the work of a succession of prophetic witnesses working across 200 years or more.


This doesn’t mean the Bible isn’t the inspired word of God. A Christian can believe in the birth, teachings, and resurrection of Jesus Christ without insisting that the world was created in six days, as Genesis recounts, or that Jonah survived inside a big fish. With all my lay and ordained siblings in the church, I believe the Bible contains all things necessary for salvation. But it can take a lifetime of discerning study to appreciate fully its foundational values of righteousness, peace, justice, and, above all, love.


Many theologically conservative Christians read scripture with modern minds, plumbing its verses for life lessons instead of clues about the Apocalypse. Denominational and evangelical Christians could discover some common ground by creating settings to study and debate the Bible together, perhaps someday healing centuries of schism and uniting behind Jesus’s commandment to love God and love one another as ourselves.


But Dispensationalist Bible interpretations are potentially deadly when politicians like Donald Trump permit them to inform their policy decisions. As recently documented in the riveting WGBH podcast “The End of Days,” so-called Christian Zionists consider the emergence of Jerusalem as the undivided capital of Israel to be a pivotal step toward the end times. Evangelical preachers’ and voters’ demand that Trump move the U.S. embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem was a classic self-fulfilling prophecy. It did considerable damage to what remains of the Israel-Palestine peace process, in which most experts agree the status of Jerusalem should be settled last.


It could get far worse if U.S. policymakers keep implementing Christian Zionist Bible study lessons. Many want Israel to annex the West Bank so its borders would match those of Bible times. The result could well be the disenfranchisement of millions of Palestinian Arabs, turning Israel into a true apartheid state.


They also favor building a third temple in Jerusalem, with animal sacrifices and all, which would require destruction of Muslim holy sites on the Temple Mount – again, to fulfill what they believe the Bible specifies on the way to the end of days. Should the U.S. ever encourage such steps, a catastrophic regional war could indeed result, all because politicians were in the thrall of those who claim that it’s actually Pete Buttigieg who misreads the Bible and disrespects Jesus.


Trump’s policies signal that it’s long past time for progressive denominational Christians and our dialogue partners in other faith traditions to reclaim the ineffable, irreducible, love- and justice-infused richness of our shared scriptural inheritance – and then make some foreign policy demands of our own. Here’s one for starters. Whoever replaces Trump should promise that they’ll dial the doomsday clock back a few millennia, not to mention reinvigorate the peace process, by moving the U.S. embassy from Jerusalem back to Tel Aviv. You with me, Mayor Pete?



The Rt. Rev. John Harvey Taylor is seventh bishop of the six-county Episcopal Diocese of Los Angeles. Featured image of Temple Mount by John Taylor.


This post originally appeared in the early summer edition of “The Episcopal News,” edited by Canon Janet Reinecke Kawamoto.


Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Marion Irwin

I appreciated the article for it’s clarity and it’s central msg: a Christian is called to love and serve.
It is, and always has been, a challenging mission.

Henry Galganowicz

Despite all the carping and hair-splitting below, I think you’re right on the mark. Thank you for your statement.

Lawrence Graham

Amen. The Church has the job and proclaiming and living out the Gospel. It does that in and for the world. And the world should be a place where biblical scholarship and church history matter. That’s why we human beings are “blessed with memory, reason and skill.” Intransigent ignorance is an unattractive substitute.

Ann Voll

You are so right. None of these people seem to get out much.

mike geibel

What a thoughtful, Christian comment. When B+Bruno former Bishop of LA was suspended for selling St. James the Great in Newport Beach during his Title VI hearing, his successor B-Taylor declared that the sale was binding and through crocodile tears told the loyal parishioners that the church was being sold for $15 million. The buyer then backed out of this “binding” contract. B- Taylor nevertheless refused to restore Reverend Cindy Voorhees and labeled it a church for roving clergy, waiting for another sale opportunity. It had sat vacant for 3 years. Under public outcry, he relented and allowed the parishioners to return as a Mission Church on a “trial basis,” but only if they promised to stop saying negative things about the Episcopal Church.

David Murray

Projection becomes you.

Ellen Campbell

Define Christian Zionist. I assume you mean US evangelicals, but they are not Zionists. Christian Zionists want to build a third temple for who? I am really surprised this got printed. People in this church hate Israel. Now we must tear apart the Bible to “prove” the broad story of the Hebrews being drawn to their place in the Holy Land is not true. I wonder how the bishop does at interfaith meetings with Jewish leaders?

JoS. S. Laughon

“It’s vital to be tolerant of one another’s styles of worship and interpretations of Holy Scripture”

Unless of course said interpretation goes against the zeitgeist.

On a more topical note, the actual influence of Third Temple/Left Behind folks is minimal. The US foreign policy establishment maintains a close partnership with Israel because of basic realpolitik. It’s easy to blame “evangelicals” for everything but its a pretty anachronistic lens.

Christopher SEITZ

Sorry, he does seem like a bit of a dunce when he writes “Like the faint echo of the Big Bang in the cosmos, the anti-Catholic, anti-sacramental suspicions of the 16th century Reformation still trouble the body of Christ.”

“Anti-sacramental suspicions of the 16th century Reformation”? Martin Luther? John Jewel or Thomas Cranmer? Martin Bucer? Even John Calvin. It is hard to know where to start here. He is cutting out the ground under anglicanism’s own sacramental theology.

Someone buy the poor man a copy of any readable history of the period. Carlos Eire’s Reformations (Yale Press) is a good choice.

Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café