Support the Café

Search our Site

Faith Reels: ‘The Letters’ … darkness amidst the light

Faith Reels: ‘The Letters’ … darkness amidst the light

By Bonnie Anderson and Dan Webster


This is the story of Mother Teresa, her journey with and without God, from cloistered nun, to the streets, and possibly to sainthood.


Some of the most common components of films these days include conflict (some extreme and often violent), sex (explicit and/or inferred), humor (laced with current concepts) or just plain good acting from well-known actors.


‘The Letters’ has none of these components but is nonetheless compelling in a very understated way. In fact, the most compelling aspect of the film is that probably most people who see this film know about Mother Teresa and the life of service to the poor that she led. ‘The Letters’ is refreshing in straightforward simplicity and in the partial telling of the committed life of service to the poor embraced by Mother Teresa (Juliet Stevenson).


Though difficult it might be for the film to give us a glimpse into the self-sacrificing commitment of the miraculous ministry of this woman, the film falls short in conveying the magnitude of her life of service.


In the film the bid for Mother Teresa’s sainthood is researched on behalf of the Roman Catholic Church and her story is told as two men, Father Celeste van Exem (Max von Sydow) and Benjamin Praggh (Hauer) recount her life.


Through letters written by Mother Teresa over five decades, movie-goers learn of her felt abandonment by God. There is some speculation but little depth on behalf of the researchers about her reasons for feeling abandoned.


Particular important public events in Mother Teresa’s life such as her acceptance of the Nobel Peace Prize in 1979, establishing the Missionaries of Charity and her daily care for the poor and sick in the streets of Calcutta are all highlighted, but the commitment she made to her call from God to serve the poor is portrayed without the passion that must have actually driven it in real life.


Understanding that it is extremely difficult to depict on film such a life as lived by Mother Teresa, there is something missing in this film that left us saying to ourselves, “There is so much more to it than this.”


Reports from the Vatican this week say Pope Francis has recognized a second medical miracle attributed to Mother Teresa clearing the way for her sainthood later this year. But not everyone thinks she is saintly material. Online searches reveal those who find fault in her handling of money and a toleration of suffering that belies her professed love.


But the Mother Teresa we see on screen is one who clearly enlarges her vision and increases her ministry to those whom Jesus most closely identified; the hungry, homeless, outcast.


The words of David Haas’ hymn, “Song of the Body of Christ” come to mind as the young nun struggled seeing the teeming poor outside the convent school walls: “We are called to heal the broken, to be hope for the poor. We are called to feed the hungry at our door.”


Bonnie Anderson is a very active lay leader in her parish, diocese and in the wider Episcopal Church. She is an experienced community organizer and lives in suburban Detroit. Dan Webster is an Episcopal priest in Baltimore, Maryland and a former broadcast news executive. But don’t expect only east coast urban perspectives here. As it turns out, they both grew up in Southern California.  They blog about films and faith at Faith Reels


Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Paul Powers

The Roman Catholic Church doesn’t teach that the proposed saint performs the miracle, but instead that he or she intercedes on behalf of the (usually) ill person, and as a result God performs the miracle. It isn’t a teaching I’m entirely comfortable with, but it’s important not to mis-characterize it.

Rod Gillis

The Roman Catholic process for “making saints” is politcal. The Vatican gets to decide who is, and who is not, a “saint”, i.e. who best meets the image of doctrinal and political orthodoxy. Popes, for example, get to become saints. Its a blatant take over of popular piety for institutional gain.

The better way to determine sainthood is who is deemed to be holy and saint like in popular imagination? Who inspires the faithful with lives and faith and commitment? This is the preferable way of establishing Sainthood. It’s not just about who is most user friendly to the agenda of the institution. Some of us would put Jonathan Daniels and Malcolm Boyd is the saint column.

Mother Theresa is clearly a populist candidate for Sainthood.

Now, are saints without controversy? Are they without colorful eccentricities? Hardly. Francis of Assisi, for example, took his clothes off in public during a court case. He participated in at least one crusade.

The late Hitchens critiqued Mother Theresa as not a friend of the poor but a friend of poverty. It was a flippant wise guy remark. Maybe he should have been more attentive to his support of politicians who were friends of the war in Iraq? But then Hitchens has become a kind of atheistic saint

Saints should be controversial, as both Peter and Paul were, and as Blessed mother Theresa is.

Rod Gillis

The world would be such a better place if there were fewer people like Blessed Mother Theresa and more M.Div. grads from prestigious divinity schools ministering to the pew purses, or more atheists employed at old boy schools, no?

Sainthood is mythology. But one must remember that Hitchens and his entourage are advocating a counter mythology of cynicism.

Blessed Mother Theresa pray for us.

Leslie Marshall

A saint is any believer. I don’t think that any believer would take credit for a miracle, –nor could they if they tried. It’s blatant idolatry to pray to a saint.

‘They exchanged the truth of God for a lie and worshipped (prayed to) created things, rather than the Creator.’
Romans 1:25

Santa Barbara County

David Allen

There are a lot of stories of the reality of this woman and her fanatical fundamentalist Catholicism. The largest fault? That everything she did in her charitable work was to evangelize. There are many folks who worked in her HIV institutions who report the withholding of care from AIDS victims, especially gay men, to get them to confess their sin and become Roman Catholic. It’s impossible for me to view this woman as anything close to a saint.

Why Mother Teresa is still no saint to many of her critics

Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café