Support the Café

Search our Site

Exactly how big is the Anglican Communion?

Exactly how big is the Anglican Communion?

A study published in the Journal of Anglican Studies says that the Anglican Communion is probably smaller that we think. The usual number is that there are 80 million Anglicans in the 38 provinces around the world, and that the Global South churches are booming while the North American and the United Kingdom are shrinking.

According to Daniel Muñoz, Lecturer in Church History, Protestant Faculty of Theology SEUT, Madrid, Spain, and as reported by Ruth Gledhill in Christian Today, there may be few active Anglicans in the Global South and more than we believed in the West:

Regarding Nigeria, often cited as a fast-growing province claiming 18 million members, he reports there could in fact be fewer than two million active Anglicans. In England, which lays claim 26 million supposed Anglicans among the 80 million figure, there are in fact about 1.7 million active Anglicans, he says. Australia claims nearly five million Anglicans but in fact just one tenth of these are active.

His analysis shows that of the nearly 80 million people claimed to be Anglican, the actual number of active Anglicans worldwide could be below nine million.

Muñoz attempts to deal with four separate problem is his research:

  • Each province counts membership differently: some use baptized members; some adult confirmed communicants; others use other measures.
  • There are differing definitions of what counts as an active member within that larger base.
  • Four provinces are “united” churches, that is they are share members from other traditions under the one umbrella, so the possibility of double or even triple counting increases in those places.
  • The unquestioned narrative that churches in the Global South are growing while those in the north are shrinking means that we don’t look closely at what is really going on.

Muñoz cites a decline or at least a plateau of growth in Kenya, Uganda, and Nigeria:

For every narrative, however, there is a counter-narrative. The counter-narrative I propose here is based on doctoral research into contemporary Anglican identity. This counter-narrative accepts the overall story, but it qualifies it. It says that whilst it is true that most of the growth of recent decades has taken place in parts of Africa and Asia, there is anecdotal evidence that this growth has reached a plateau and in some cases has turned into decline, in certain parts of Africa.

On the other hand, there are signs that the oft-cited decline in the West has slowed or even leveled off.

The other part of this narrative comes from the West. While it is true that Anglican churches in Western nations have experienced a steady decline during the second half of the twentieth century, there are signs that this trend may have changed in the first decade of the twenty-first century. Decline has slowed significantly and in some cases, like England, it has reached a plateau in the last decade.

Gledhill cites a Church of England spokesman who challenges Muñoz in his differentiation between baptized members and active membership. It is active membership that Muñoz emphasized in his study, saying that there probably only about 9 million “active” members of the Anglican communion worldwide.

An Anglican Communion spokesman said: “Although the Church of England has a professional statistics unit and can provide numbers and the basis on which they are calculated, other provinces in the Anglican Communion may use less sophisticated methods to estimate membership. We have not checked with them recently. However and more importantly, it is for Daniel Munoz to provide a theologically sound definition of church membership and the justification for dismissing baptism as the traditional gauge, if that is what he is doing.”

Statistics matter. It’s often said that organizations do what they measure. And batting around statistics is one way we tell our story. It has become a habit to use our numbers as weapons to back up our theological stands. But if it is true that the Churches in the Global South are experiencing stagnation in the rural areas, and even decline as these areas de-populate, and if the level of attendance in urban areas is also spotty or shrinking then perhaps, despite all the posturing, we have more in common than we’ve been willing to admit.

Maybe one of the implications for mission is that urbanization, migration, and technology are having impacts across the globe–and that all of us, Western and Global South churches are in the same boat. One lesson from a realistic view of how big and how active we are as Anglicans is that how we communicate the Gospel in this kind of world is the one really important issue that we all share.

About the map of the Anglican Communion (circa 1963)


Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Greg [Anderson]

For all future comments, please follow the comment policy by posting with your first & last names.

Working on that premise, not only would numbers in the Anglican Communion be affected but so too would every other “mainstream” branch of the Christian church. Thus, for example, the Roman Church couldn’t claim 1.2 billion members but rather something closer to only 200 million world wide, ( or less), as that is the approximate number of those Roman Catholics who actually go to Mass. Likewise Eastern Orthodoxy would tumble from 225 million members to possibly only 20 million. The Lutheran, Reformed, Baptist, Methodist traditions would also be deeply affected. On the other hand, in regards to the Anglican figures, scholars like John Oakland ( see his “British Civilization: an Introduction” circa 2011) put Anglican Communion numbers as having already passed as 90 million.

Scott Wesley

If nothing else, this article clarifies that we don’t really have any idea what we mean when we talk about the number Anglicans. We don’t have agreed definitions. We don’t have agreed counting methods. It might be nice to have a meaningful number – but I still think we would not know what it means. And the point in the numbers game seems to be to create a tool/weapon. Being “big” numerically is about wealth and power. Better we should walk humbly in Jesus’ footsteps. Jesus – who calls us to feed sheep rather than to count them.

June Butler

“TEC actually uses a much more stringent measure of membership, however.”

Indeed. The large numbers cited by the Global South seem to figure mightily in decisions by Archbishop Justin Welby. Since the Episcopal Church is quite small vis-a-vis the many millions of Anglicans in other provinces, why should TEC have clout? If we just continue to fund what’s left of the former Anglican Communion, we may be allowed to remain on sufferance.

John Chilton

Example of a Gafcon statement (using “active”)
“Grateful for the gracious guidance of the Holy Spirit a total of 130 delegates from 20 provinces in the Global South (comprising Africa, West Indies, Asia and South America) gathered together. We represented the vast majority of the active membership of the Anglican Communion.”

Muñoz adopts the following definition of “active” ( = inner circle membership) and applies it uniformly across all provinces:

“I followed here Peter Brierly, the leading statistician of the British organization Christian Research. Brierly’s distinction between these two types of membership is a helpful way to analyze current demographics of the Anglican Communion.24 The two types of membership are defined as follows:
∙ Outer circle membership: those who identify themselves as Anglican, either through national census or general affiliation. This group includes both, those who are active church members and those who are not actively involved in their local churches.
∙ Inner circle membership: those who are active church members. Brierly distinguishes between two distinct yet overlapping inner circles: one formed by those who are church members and one representing church attendees.25 For clarity and simplicity, I have merged these two into one single inner circle group that includes both membership criteria: (a) regular church attendance,26 that is, not those who only attend occasional offices … and (b) registration in a local church electoral roll.

Kurt Hill

Well then, by this “outer circle” criteria, The Episcopal Church’s membership could be figured at about 5 million people, which is about the number of people in this country who “identify” with us. TEC actually uses a much more stringent measure of membership, however.

Kurt Hill
Brooklyn, NY

John Chilton

Yes. CoE, it seems, uses an “outer measure.” And despite their jab about “active members”, Gafcon provinces appear, on the whole, to be using outer measures, or something even more broad.

David Allen

It’s hard to do when you often see these silly communiques that read, “We, the Anglican Omnipotent, representing way more Anglicans than any other measly group of Anglicans, hereby declare…”

Kurt Hill

Right on, Br. David! This study should give ACNA et. al. a little more humility…we can hope…

Kurt Hill
Brooklyn, NY

Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café