Support the Café

Search our Site

Will Evangelicals help Trump in Iowa today?

Will Evangelicals help Trump in Iowa today?

Illustrative image for faith and politics: word cloud of Pope Francis’s addressing Congress via Ron Mader

The Iowa Caucus is today, and people around the world are watching to see who will win this important early primary vote in a crowded election cycle. Historically, the GOP Caucus in Iowa has been heavily influenced by voters who identify themselves as Evangelical Christians, and conventional wisdom has long held that voters are unlikely to elect a politician who isn’t religious.

NPR reports that this isn’t necessarily true anymore; Pew Research Center and Public Religion Research Institute released a report finding that voters are generally less religious now, and that even among the faithful, religious beliefs matter less to voters. This might spell good news for Trump, who is seen as the least religious of all candidates.

From the article:

Just 30 percent of U.S. adults view Trump as even “somewhat” religious, according to a new survey from the Pew Research Center. No other candidate, Republican or Democrat, scores lower.

On Sunday, NPR spoke to Evangelical voters in Iowa, to ask them about Trump’s dominance in their polls. They found that Evangelical voters aren’t a monolithic group, and they seem to run counter to nation-wide trends. Some voters said outright appeals to faith felt manipulative, and that they were looking at specific policies and discerning God’s presence. Many voters said that Trump’s platform would run counter to their own Christian beliefs.

From the article:

“I don’t give support simply by quoting the Bible. I want to see it lived out in the policy,” said John Lee, a pastor in Sioux Center. “I’m not electing a pastor in chief. I’m electing a commander in chief.”

Lee doesn’t know who he will vote for in Monday’s caucus, but he knows who he won’t be supporting: Ted Cruz and Donald Trump. Lee said his Christian beliefs lead him to oppose their hard-line immigration stances — policies that are part of what he labels “callous conservatism.”

In the end, Iowa may not prove decisive for the GOP; it didn’t in 2008 or 2012, when Evangelical voters propelled first Huckabee and later Santorum to victory. Neither candidate went on to win the primary.

Others express skepticism that religious views are really key influencers in the voting booth; writing for the Lexington Herald Leader, Paul Prather explores the work of political scientist Matthew MacWilliams, who found that religious influences sometimes seemed to correlate, but weren’t ultimately significant in voters motivations.

From the article:

“Only two of the variables I looked at were statistically significant: authoritarianism, followed by fear of terrorism, though the former was far more significant than the latter.”

Authoritarians, a group studied by social scientists for decades, inclined sharply toward Trump.

MacWilliams summarized what it means to be authoritarian:

“Authoritarians obey. They rally to and follow strong leaders. And they respond aggressively to outsiders, especially when they feel threatened.”

Statistically, MacWilliams found, among those likely to vote in the Republican primary, 49 percent ranked high on the authoritarian scale. That’s more than twice as many as among Democratic voters.

We often see mainstream media focus on how religious affiliation shapes voting and election participation in the Republican party and, separately, in Evangelical churches, but we rarely hear about it in other parties and churches. Do you think that most religious people, regardless of political party or denomination, are motivated by their faith when they vote? Are you? What type of religious factors do you consider when you vote?


Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ann Fontaine

oops — guess not.

June Butler

I don’t know whether evangelicals in Iowa will vote for Trump. We shall see. I care about the religion of candidates only when their policies push the country toward theocracy by attempting to make their religious views the law of the land. I would not cast my vote for such a candidate. Also, I do not vote for commander-in-chief; I vote for president.

Leslie Marshall

I think (if Trump wins in Iowa) that the Iowan evangelicals voted for Trump for every reason –except their Christian faith.

Of all the candidates, only Bernie Sanders is less religious than Mr Trump [by a very slim margin].

I tend to vote for the candidate that supports small Government, I don’t care what their religion or lack of religion is (although, i probably wouldn’t vote for a Wiccan.)

JC Fisher

“I tend to vote for the candidate that supports small Government”

Happy to discover you’re for keeping Government away from a woman’s reproductive choice, Leslie! ;-/

Dr. William A. Flint, MDiv, PhD

Another observation when it comes to the General Election, the RNC was taken over by Evangelicals on two occasions and in both incidences the GOP lost the White House bid. There is a danger of looking too evangelical in the General Election. The vast number of American voters outnumber Evangelicals. Warning!

Dr. William A. Flint, MDiv, PhD

What type of religious factors do you consider when you vote?

I look to character (allowing for persons to change their minds included). In this election, I am looking for the confession that the person I am voting for declare their faith. It is important to know they are willing to acknowledge God and the desire to follow the precepts of love and forgiveness.

I keep in mind, that all (including myself) have sinned and fallen short of the Gospel’s message in life. A candidate that constantly uses “god-talk” will lose my vote. It is more at how they conduct their campaign and how they treat their opponents that counts. Also those PAC groups, though independent from the candidate, they still speak in the candidate’s name. How they define the boundaries with the PAC groups are important.

I have committed my vote for one candidate because I believe him.

Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café