Equally Blessed on the John Jay sexual abuse report

by

The pro-LGBT Catholic group Equally Blessed has read the John Jay report. It has both praise and concerns.


Praise:

The John Jay College Final Report issued yesterday does faithful Catholics good service by discrediting the ungrounded, homophobic accusations of the Catholic League’s Bill Donohue and others that the church’s clergy sex abuse scandal was caused by gay priests. Now that research commissioned by the bishops themselves has shown Donohue’s rhetoric to be based in prejudice rather than in fact, we call on the US Conference of Catholic Bishops to speak out on the side of truth when Donohue and his allies perpetrate homophobic slurs in the name of Catholicism.

“As Catholics who love our church and want it to follow Jesus’ teachings of compassion and justice more closely, we are struck by the report’s comparison of the conditions that allowed child abuse to flourish to those that foster police brutality. Both sins require a closed, authoritarian structure that is suspicious of outsiders and mistrustful of the people it is supposed to serve. While the church, at last, is laboring mightily to overcome the shame of clergy sex abuse, the conditions that allow sexual and financial abuse and other misdeeds to flourish will remain in place as long as laypeople and women and men religious have no authority to hold their clerical leaders accountable for their behavior. We call upon the bishops to address these serious structural flaws in the church.

Concerns:

While we are thankful that the report finally lifts the cloud of homophobia from this debate, it has been too long in coming and raises several significant concerns. In particular, we find little support within the document for its authors’ assertion that the social upheavals of the 1960s and 1970s were responsible for the sexual abuse of children by Catholic priests. It is equally possible that those upheavals, which gave people new courage to oppose repressive authoritarian structures, made it more possible for abused Catholics who had long been carrying heavy secrets to come forward. Neither can the countercultural revolution in the United States be blamed for the global scope of the crisis, or for the fact that it continues today in places such as the Archdiocese of Philadelphia.

Like many of our brothers and sisters who advocate for the abused, we are dumbfounded by the decision to define children ages 10-13 as pubescent. This classification, which should alarm parents with common sense regardless of theological persuasion, has the effect of making clergy abuse scandal look less sinister because fewer ‘children’ were involved. This is an insult to many survivors of abuse and their families, and we urge our brother and sister Catholics not to allow this error to mitigate their sense of horror at what has been done.

_____

Related stories:

Catholic abuse report authors defend findings – a reactions roundup

Clergy Sexual Abuse Final Report due out – an initial report

Dislike (0)
Facebooktwittergoogle_pluspinterestlinkedinmail
newest oldest
Notify of
tgflux
Guest
tgflux

[The following is PURE speculation, pulled straight out of...]

The only way in which I could imagine that "the social circumstances of the 60s and 70s" MIGHT be (slightly) responsible, is that I think more priests might have had domiciles on their own then (that is, they had more privacy in which to perpetrate crimes against youth).

Other than that, I completely agree that the "Post-Woodstock" era was much more one of REPORTING sexual abuse by priests.

JC Fisher

Like (0)
Dislike (0)