Support the Café

Search our Site

Episcopalians speak up against Alaskan oil drilling

Episcopalians speak up against Alaskan oil drilling

As government conversation moves closer to the funding of oil drilling in protected Alaskan lands, the Episcopal church is speaking out against the threat to environment, wildlife and native people, continuing a conversation that was a highlight of the House of Bishops’ fall meeting in Alaska. From the Episcopal News Service:

The Gwich’in, mostly Episcopalians because of the church’s early missionary work in the region, are one of the largest Native communities in Alaska. Those who live in the small villages of the Alaskan Interior still follow many of the traditional subsistence ways of life that their families have for thousands of years, though that lifestyle now faces environmental, cultural and economic threats.

The fate of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge loomed large during the bishops’ time in Alaska in late September. They learned that the Gwich’in are trying to protect the part of the refuge that serves as a major caribou birthing ground and is considered sacred by Native Alaskans. The caribou, hunted only after the herds migrate south, are a critical part of the villagers’ diet.

“People actually had the wisdom to set aside some areas so they would not be open to development, and they really are crucial to future generations,” Princess Johnson, a Gwich’in activist and an Episcopalian, told the bishops during one of their sessions.

The threat is still unrealized, but 19.6 million acres of wildlife refuge are the likely target:

No drilling has yet been approved, but on Oct. 19, the Energy and Natural Resources Committee, led by Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski, preserved a measure in the Republicans’ proposed budget that calls on the committee to find $1 billion in revenue through federal leasing. That measure doesn’t specify drilling in Alaska, though the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge is the most likely target.

“It is the best option, and it’s on the table,” Murkowski, a Republican, said, according to a Washington Post report.  “It’s about jobs, and job creation. It’s about wealth and wealth creation.”

[Diocese of Alaska Bishop Mark] Lattime, in his statement to ENS, acknowledged the economic benefits of drilling, but the “true cost of these benefits” – to the Gwich’in and to the environment – “is never accurately measured.”

“We are called by our baptism to strive for justice and peace among all people and respect the dignity of every human being,” he continued. “The value of the ANWR ecosystem and the Gwich’in people is beyond measure, and we have a moral stewardship obligation to recognize this value and to preserve it.”

The Episcopal Church House of Bishops issued a letter in September:

The Episcopal Church’s Office of Government Relations has stepped up its advocacy on the Arctic refuge as has lawmakers have renewed the possibility of drilling in its 19.6 million acres, which only Congress can approve.

“This sacred land is under threat,” Office of Government Relations said in a Sept. 27 policy alert to its network asking Episcopalians to contact their representatives. “The Episcopal Church has long stood by the Gwich’in, defending their right to exist and feed themselves. As the bishops of the church call us to prayer, education, and reconciliation, we must also act.”

Image: Steven Chase, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, via Wikipedia



Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Quentin Durward

Something is missing but what is not missing is a lot of innuendo. This involves 2 competing indigenous people. Certainly, we should support the Gwich’in (Athabaskans) right to exist and feed themselves but theirs is not at risk. The Inupiat (Eskimos) are the residents of the site to be drilled and who own the mineral rights. Don’t feel sorry for the Gwich’in. They aren’t so naive, having entered into their own oil leases, but they want more. We are commanded not to covet but, after a closer look, it’s hard to dismiss that the Gwich’in might have an axe to grind because the Inupiat could be getting a better deal. It’s likely that the Gwich’in feel they can benefit by playing victim and I have little doubt this will the case. As for the Caribou, decades of study by Alaska Dept. of Fish and Game have shown that the oil industry’s presence has not had a negative effect on caribou herds. When is a caribou not a caribou? When it’s a red herring!

Marshall Scott

Sibling Quentin, I would be very interested in your sources, especially about income for the Inupiat and Gwich’in communities from oil leases (basic news information – I’m not asking about valuations). I’d also be interested in being pointed to the research on the caribou.

Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café