Support the Café

Search our Site

Episcopal priest among those suing in response to Mississippi law

Episcopal priest among those suing in response to Mississippi law

The Campaign for Southern Equality and the Reverend Susan Hrostowski are two of the plaintiffs filing  lawsuits against Mississippi House Bill 1523, currently slated to become law on July 1, according to an Associated Press story in the Chicago Tribune:

The law will allow clerks to cite religious objections to recuse themselves from issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples. It says those who recuse themselves must find another employee to issue the license, but legislators did not say what would happen if all employees in a particular clerk’s office decline to help same-sex couples.

State attorneys say the law is a reasonable accommodation to protect religious beliefs, but opponents say it sanctions discrimination.

The Episcopal priest-backed suit states that the bill

“rather than respect that all men (and women) are created equal, declares that certain people — only those who hold particular state-defined religious beliefs — should have special rights and privileges. Even worse, it allows them to exercise those special rights and privileges in derogation of the fundamental equality and dignity of a politically unpopular minority group.”

That suit and a second will be heard tomorrow and Friday by U.S. District Judge Carlton Reeves, who has responded to one suit so far, from the ACLU of Mississippi by refusing the stop the bill.

The Mississippi Center for Justice filed one of the suits June 3 for a diverse group of gay and straight plaintiffs. It says the law violates the separation of church and state by favoring “certain narrow religious beliefs that condemn same-sex couples who get married, condemn unmarried people who have sexual relations and condemn transgender people.”

The ACLU suit was brought “”on behalf of same-sex couple Nykolas Alford and Stephen Thomas of Meridian, who have been engaged for nearly two years,” says the Clarion Ledger.

Alford and Thomas called HB 1523 “a slap in the face.”

“It makes us feel like second-class citizens,” Alford said of the law last month. “You should serve the entire public.”

Reeves said in a four-page order that “Because injunctions regulate future conduct, the plaintiff must allege and ultimately prove a real and immediate — as opposed to a merely conjectural or hypothetical —  threat of future injury.”

Reeves said the motion for a preliminary injunction fails because the plaintiffs haven’t shown the injury is imminent.

“None of the plaintiffs are at imminent risk of injury,” Reeves said. “Alford and Thomas’ injury, if one exists, would arise when they apply for a marriage license. But they declare that they will apply for a marriage license sometime within the next three years. That is not imminent.”

The bill can be found online here.



Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Anne Bay

Hard to believe a state legislature would propose such a bill. They have a long way to go on providing equal rights for the citizens of Mississippi.

Jay Croft

Not surprising at all.

There’s a saying in the state just east of Mississippi:

“Thank God for Mississippi. They make Alabama look good.”

Dr. William A Flint, MDiv, PhD

The Federal District Judge in Jackson upheld HB-1523 and it is still the Law.

David H. Johnson

Susan has been a faithful, courageous, and persistent priest throughout her years of ordained ministry. She is no stranger to challenging unjust structures. It is people like Susan who lead us into the future. I was at her court hearing this morning, and the courtroom was packed. She has the support and prayers of many.

Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café