Support the Café

Search our Site

Epiphany – what really went down?

Epiphany – what really went down?

Ian Paul, theologian, author and professor, blogging at Psephizo has a recent post examining the historicity of Matthew’s gospel concerning the stories we associate with Epiphany.

He begins;

The Feast of the Epiphany in the church’s liturgical calendar is based on the events of Matt 2.1–12, the visit of the ‘wise men’ from the East to the infant Jesus. There are plenty of things about the story which might make us instinctively treat it as just another part of the constellation of Christmas traditions, which does not have very much connection with reality.

But he goes on to make a reasonable case for, if not the historical accuracy of the story, then at least its historical possibility.

Moreover, Matthew is making use of a text which was not known as ‘messianic’; in the first century, the idea that messiah had to come from Bethlehem as a son of David was known but not very widespread.

All this is rather bad news for those who would argue that Jesus’ birth was carefully planned to be a literal fulfilment of OT prophecy. But it is equally bad news for those who argue that Matthew made the story up to fit such texts, and for exactly the same reason. Of course, Matthew is working in a context where midrashic reading of texts means that they are a good deal more flexible than we would consider them. But he is needing to make maximum use of this flexibility, and the logical conclusion of this would be that he was constrained by the other sources he is using—by the account he has of what actually happened.


And in conclusion;

Clearly, God could have done a much better job of the whole business. But it rather appears as though Matthew felt unable to improve on what happened by fitting it either to the OT texts or his sense of what ought to have happened.

The modern reader might struggle with aspects of Matthew’s story. But it seems to me you can only dismiss it by making a large number of other, unwarranted assumptions.


Go check it out for yourself


Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Leslie Marshall

Nearly all the Jews missed that the entire Old Testament points to Jesus of Nazareth, born in Bethlehem, son of David, silent lamb to slaughter, covered in stripes, born of a virgin, named ‘God with Us’, as the Messiah.

That doesn’t meant that the Old Testament Scripture is wrong. It means the Jews were blinded.

Rod Gillis

The history of Christians lecturing Jews on what they know and do not know is so appalling, it would be better if we Christians just remained silent.

David Allen

However, that’s just one take on the Old Testament.

Rod Gillis

“Clearly, God could have done a much better job of the whole business.” That is what happens when you don’t follow the Prime Directive.

Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café