Support the Café

Search our Site

Ebola and social media

Ebola and social media

The power (and curse) of social media is again being debated during the Ebola crisis, especially after each new case in the US hits the front page.

When news hit that Dr. Craig Spencer, a New York physician, contracted Ebola while serving Doctors Without Borders in West Africa, social media either portrays him as a selfless humanitarian — or a reckless fool heedless of others’ health.

Social media certainly is certainly a handy tool for those who want to spread fear.

…users [can] take to the same outlets to share half-truths and rumors, perpetuating a number of irrational fears about Ebola. Misinformation can spread much faster across the U.S. than the virus ever could.

To see how much faster the which kind of tweet travels, check out the relative reach of the two tweets above. Both were snagged off Twitter at about the same time. One after fifteen hours, the other after three.

Still, social media can also spread useful information that can calm fears.

Another leading doctor in Sierra Leone, Dr. Modupeh Cole from Freetown’s Connaught Hospital, has died of Ebola. His death is a stark reminder of the danger that doctors and nurses across West Africa are facing during this unprecedented outbreak.

Many heard about Cole’s passing through their radios, which are everywhere, and have long been the key source of news in Sierra Leone. A significant number, though, found out through social media, which is quickly overtaking the radio as the de facto source for news.

Social media has also been a unifying source of strength for many in Sierra Leone. There have been many support groups that formed online and some of the most popular groups on Whatsapp are now called “Kick Ebola out of Salone” (The term of endearment for their country) or “Ebola is Real!”

The CDC is also using social media to quickly spread good information about the virus and the outbreak in this country.

This image speaks to the imbalance implicit in much of the media response:


It appears that, like any tool, social media in and of itself is morally neutral. The moral agents–the ones who can make social media “good” or “bad”–are people.


Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café