Support the Café

Search our Site

Does The Help help?

Does The Help help?

Elizabeth Geitz is not sure whether the runaway popularity of the movie The Help, based on the bestselling book of the same name, is an altogether good thing. She writes:

Like many women in America, or let me be clear, white women in America, I devoured every word of The Help when I read it two years ago. The fact that an author had written in dialect for another race bothered me, but I believed the good of the book outweighed the bad. It revealed the Hilly’s of the world for who and what they are, racist self-absorbed bigots. It portrayed the South of the 50s and 60s as it was when I grew up there – with the ‘colored only’ water fountains, separate entrance to the balcony of movie theaters for African Americans, separate schools for blacks and whites, stiffly starched uniforms for those African American women who had no choice but to work as maids in white homes. It was a terrific book, I thought, for it revealed the South as I knew it and lived it.

However, she notes:

There is only one perspective portrayed in both the book and the movie, the perspective of white people. Black women are portrayed as one-dimensional, stereotypical ‘characters’ – not as real flesh and blood people with families, feelings, hopes, and dreams of their own. Real women who are just as able, smart, ambitious, and willing-to-take risks as Skeeter. Real women who cry like Skeeter did over ways they were hurt by their own Mamas.

Geitz points readers to a statement, critical of the film from the Association of Black Women Historians, but concludes that author Kathryn Stockett has at least initiated a helpful conversation.


Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Apps 55753818692 1675970731 F785b701a6d1b8c33f0408

I have not yet seen the movie but I’m currently reading the book. From Elizabeth Geitz’s comments it would appear the movie is very different the book.

I am uncertain that I follow Geitz’s conclusion about there being only one perspective, that of the white women, and that black women are portrayed as “one-dimensional” and not as “flesh and blood people”. In the book, at least up to where I last left it, the characters of Aibileen Clark and Minny Jackson are far from one-dimmensional.

Ms. Geitz’s comments make me very curious to see the movie in order to compare it to the original work. Perhaps the movie, in part or as a whole, is not what the author of the book originally intended?

-Cullin R. Schooley

Travis Trott

JC, I think one of the bad habits that keeps us from talking honestly and thoroughly about racism and how to “hammer it down” as it were, is using cushion language such as “racial insensitivity.” Racism does not only include malicious prejudice, but also seemingly benign assumptions, as well as unexamined privilege.

In fact, that is one of the more valid and articulated criticisms of the movie: that they paint the white women as not just racists but mean people in general, so that the narrative we have about racism is upheld–that only bad people are racist and good people are “misguided” at worst.

So racism doesn’t have to be malicious. Our confrontation of racism also doesn’t have to be hysterical (and I’d like to clarify that I didn’t cry, “Racist!” as you imply was my intent), but can be combated with love and compassion and strength.


[Disclaimer: I’ve neither read the book nor seen the movie. Not sure if I will.]

“the racist assumptions of the author”: might this be an overstatement? I’ve heard nothing to allege racism—with malevolence or active resentment, based upon race—in the author. “Racially-insensitive” however, seems quite likely.

If one uses the hammer of “Racist!” indiscriminately (as it were), everyone will look like a nail. Some people only require a *nudge*.

JC Fisher

Travis Trott

There are some amazing commentaries on this movie in the blogosphere, particularly those written by feminists of color. I would credit the author of the book for bringing up racism in general, but I would credit these writers and critics for their bringing up the racist assumptions of the author, as well as racist film narratives in Hollywood.

Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café