Support the Café
Search our site

“Disabled God” theologian: Nancy Eiesland

“Disabled God” theologian: Nancy Eiesland

The New York Times reports that theologian and author of The Disabled God: Toward a Liberatory Theology of Disability, Nancy Eiesland has died: (see comments for error on date)

By the time the theologian and sociologist Nancy Eiesland was 13 years old, she had had 11 operations for the congenital bone defect in her hips and realized pain was her lot in life. So why did she say she hoped that when she went to heaven she would still be disabled? The reason, which seems clear enough to many disabled people, was that her identity and character were formed by the mental, physical and societal challenges of her disability. She felt that without her disability, she would “be absolutely unknown to myself and perhaps to God.”

By the time of her death at 44 on March 10, Ms. Eiesland had come to believe that God was in fact disabled, a view she articulated in her influential 1994 book, “The Disabled God: Toward a Liberatory Theology of Disability.” She pointed to the scene described in Luke 24:36-39 in which the risen Jesus invites his disciples to touch his wounds.

“In presenting his impaired body to his startled friends, the resurrected Jesus is revealed as the disabled God,” she wrote. God remains a God the disabled can identify with, she argued — he is not cured and made whole; his injury is part of him, neither a divine punishment nor an opportunity for healing.

Dislike (0)
0 0 vote
Article Rating
Facebooktwitterpinterestlinkedinmail

Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

5 Comments
Newest
Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Nathan Roser

Sorry...I had read only the first third or so of Gutierrez's "A Theology of Liberation," was familiar with Tutu's testimony before the Eloff Commission, and knew the conservative Catholic church's reaction to the genre. Considering that Gutierrez does cite Marx a lot--a lot--I didn't know that this methodology had broadened beyond an economic, dialectical critique of Christianity. My mistake.

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
tgflux

I think in the last 20 years or so, Nathan, various theologies of liberation have broadened considerably. Particularly, they have been constructed by traditionally marginalized groups (hence, various ethnic theologies of liberation, feminist/womanist/mujerista theologies of liberation, LGBT theologies of liberation, differently-abled theologies of liberation, etc).

While the concept of "liberation" itself may emerge from a Marxist context, I wouldn't say that Marxism is intrinsic to a theology of liberation (unless a specific theological inventor says it is! ;-/)

JC Fisher

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
Nathan Roser

Quick question. Was Ms. Eiesland in any way a "liberation theologian"? That is a specific term referring to a fusion of Christianity with Marxism, ie people like Gustavo Gutierrez, James Cone, Desmond Tutu (yes, him). Being a disabled individual, I can understand why one would be tempted to use the concept of liberation or freedom in discussing the concept of disability, but generally speaking, being a liberation theologian means something entirely different.

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
Ann Fontaine

uhoh - thanks Laura - check dates - check dates.

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
LKT

Ummm...she died over 3 years ago. Check the date on the link. Still worthy of reporting, of course, and the theology deserves attention.

Laura Toepfer

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
Facebooktwitterrss
Support the Café
Past Posts
2020_001

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café