Support the Café
Search our site

Dionne: Supreme Court failed empathy test in prayer ruling

Dionne: Supreme Court failed empathy test in prayer ruling

The five justices of the U. S. Supreme Court who voted to permit sectarian prayers before public meetings failed to imagine how religious minorities experience those prayers, writes E. J. Dionne in The Washington Post.

Religious liberty, wrote Justice Elaine Kagan in her dissent, is based on

“the breathtakingly generous constitutional idea that our public institutions belong no less to the Buddhist or Hindu than to the Methodist or Episcopalian.”

Religious liberty will not disappear because of the court’s 5-to-4 ruling that the government of Greece, N.Y., can begin its town board meetings with prayers — even though, as Kagan put it, “month in and month out for over a decade,” they were “steeped in only one faith,” Christianity.

But the court majority not only failed the empathy test but also lost the opportunity Kagan offered to find a balance that would both honor religion’s role in American public life and safeguard the rights of those whose faith commitments diverge from the majority’s.

Do you agree?

Dislike (0)
0 0 vote
Article Rating
Facebooktwitterpinterestlinkedinmail

Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

1 Comment
Newest
Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Richard III

No one should be surprised that a right leaning Republican majority would see it any other way. After all America is a Christian nation that has conveniently forgotten its' heritage as a religiously inclusive society where state sponsored religion was viewed as an unhealthy and unwise situation. We may not have an officially recognized religion but it might just as well be Christianity. As tolerant as many "christians" would have you believe they are of other faith traditions it just isn't so. Too many of our co-religionists dislike Jews and absolutely despise Muslims, largely out of their sheer ignorance and assumptions that we're better than they are, after all we're the only ones who will achieve salvation and get into heaven because we know that we have a monopoly on Jesus. Go ask any unquestioning believer about it and you'll get your answer. What's it called, hubris?

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
Facebooktwitterrss
Support the Café
Past Posts
2020_001

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café