Support the Café

Search our Site

Dealing with the “Poor Father” syndrome

Dealing with the “Poor Father” syndrome

Mark Silk at Religion News Service writes about clergy sexual abuse and misconduct in Dealing with the “Poor Father” Syndrome:

A decade ago, I heard a Catholic lawyer who’d made a career of representing religious institutions in sex abuse cases describe the difference between reporting a wayward clergyman to a Methodist or Episcopal bishop versus “one of ours.” In the former case, he’d sit down in the Protestant leader’s living room, with the photos of children and grandchildren on the mantle, and the man’s sympathy would at once go to the abused. In the latter, the meeting would take place in a chancery conference room and the first words out of His Excellency’s mouth would be, “Poor Father.”

This memory comes to mind after reading Grant Gallicho’s fine account over at dotCommonweal of the current mess in the archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis. Thanks to brave whistleblowing by its former canon lawyer, it has become clear that over the past decade Archbishop John Nienstedt and his predecessor Harry Flynn both failed in their responsibility to report suspected abusers to the civil authorities.

Thought Silk is mainly discussing the Roman Catholic Church, this syndrome continues to operate in some places the Episcopal Church as well as others.


Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Rev. Don Hands, Ph.D.

Those RC Bishops saw sin and worried about Father’s soul more than they saw crime and a victim. Their treatment centers diagnosed “Father” with ‘sexual disorder’ not sexual assault of a non-consenting victim. The whole system was designed to protect ‘Father’.

Paul Woodrum

Unfortunately Title IV, in its concern for victims, has stigmatized and eliminated protective rights for the accused. It reflects a guilty until proven innocent mentality. A basic principle of western law is that justice means protection against false accusation and protection for the rights of the accused who are presumed innocent until proven guilty. Title IV needs to restore protections for the accused.

Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café