Support the Café

Search our Site

Covenant trails as voting nears halfway mark in C of E

Covenant trails as voting nears halfway mark in C of E

Alan Perry has done us the service of gathering the results of the voting on the proposed Anglican Covenant in the Church of England. It is too early to predict the covenant’s defeat, but perhaps not too early to begin wondering what will become of the document if, in fact, it is defeated in the Church of England.

Will that stop the adoption process in the wider Communion in its tracks, or will the Church of England have to endure the “second tier” status once predicted for the Episcopal Church? And if so, how can the Archbishop of Canterbury continue to function as the leader of the communion while leading a church that might conceivably be excluded from certain gatherings of governing bodies?

Here are the numbers:

Twenty one of the Church of England’s 44 dioceses have voted. Thirteen opposed the covenant. Eight favor it. Supporters need 23 affirmative votes to have the matter referred to the church’s General Synod, where its prospects may be somewhat better than they have been thus far in the dioceses.

Alan Perry’s breakdown reveals that it is clergy and lay people who are closely divided on the merits of the covenant while bishops are strongly supportive.

Bishops: 84.2% for, 10.5% against, 5.3% abstentions

Clergy: 45.8% for, 48.9% against, 5.4% abstentions

Laity: 50.3% for, 43.9% against, 5.8% abstentions

Overall: 49.1% for, 45.3% against, 5.6% abstentions


Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Rod Gillis

The covenant has been designed to intentionally marginalize synodical government in provinces like TEC and Canada. It’s based on the hegemony as unity model. It favors hierarchy. Despite intervention and spin by Anglican Communion office bureaucrats, it has already failed because it has resulted in controversy and contention among dioceses over at mother corp. If it does pass across the pond, it will be a Pyrrhic victory.

tobias haller

I think it very important to note that the “overall” figure may be interesting — insofar as it shows that among those eligible to vote the Covenant has not achieved a majority, thereby indicating anything like a consensus that it is a good idea — but that the voting in synods if by orders, and resolutions must be adopted in all three orders within a diocese so as to determine the diocesan “vote.” The real “vote” at this point, in terms of the process, remains at 13 against, 8 for. I suspect there will be efforts to “spin” the raw numbers — as often happens with votes by orders and votes of the electoral college — but the voting that counts is the vote of the diocese as a whole, which requires a majority in each of the three orders. This is an essentially conservative process, and surely appropriate for something portrayed as “way forward” for Anglicanism.

Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café