Support the Café

Search our Site

Covenant having a bad weekend

Covenant having a bad weekend

Last weekend three Church of England dioceses voted to affirm the Anglican Covenant. The week before three voted against. So far this week, including the vote of Sodor and Man on Thursday night, another three dioceses have voted against the Anglican Covenant.

Today, the Diocese of Chelmsford voted against. The Covenant was narrowly defeated in the clergy order.

From Twitter: “@auntygladys: Bishops 2 for 1 against 1 ab, clergy 2 more against than for, laity 31 for 30 against so just defeated.”

The Diocese of Hereford also voted against the Covenant, with a tie in the Clergy order and a narrow defeat in the lay order:

From Facebook: “”Hereford Diocesan Synod voted against Covenant 3rd March 2012. Bishops 2 for; Clergy 15 for, 15 against, 1 abstained; laity 21 for, 23 against, 1 abst.”

We’re still waiting to hear from the Diocese of Bradford.

UPDATE: Bradford has narrowly voted in favor. (From @layanglicana) That makes 2 against, 1 for today, and the total now 13 against, 8 in favor.

Thinking Anglicans has the details of the votes.


Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Susan Hedges

So, I am confused about something else. . . Is it Chelmsford or Helmsford? Or is it Helmsford or Hereford? Or is Helmsford just a wild typo?

Thanks Susan – Chelmsford and Hereford. ~ed.

Nicholas Knisely

Yep – my bad. Thanks Jim. Just saw the detailed vote on Thinking Anglicans. I’ve updated the report.

Jim Naughton

I am pretty sure the clergy in Chelmsford defeated it.

Nicholas Knisely

I think you’re reading the tweet correctly Paige, but the reports on Twitter all claim that Chelmsford voted “no”. So there’s either a typo in the tweet or a rule of order that we don’t understand.

Paige Baker

Today, the Diocese of Chelmsford voted against. The Covenant was narrowly defeated in the lay order.

I confess to having difficulty reading tweets sometimes, but it looks to me as if the lay delegates in Chelmsford voted FOR the covenant, 31 to 30.

Did the clergy reject it and that’s why it failed? Or am I missing something? (Wouldn’t be the first time! 😉

Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café