Support the Café

Search our Site

Contraception coverage and the Affordable Care Act: the latest

Contraception coverage and the Affordable Care Act: the latest

Mark Silk is paying close attention to every twist and turn in the legal arguments surrounding contraception coverage and the Affordable Care Act so you don’t have to. In his latest dispatch he writes:

Last week the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals gave Hobby Lobby the go-ahead to challenge the Affordable Care Act’s contraception mandate. In due course, the Supreme Court may well decide that the federal government cannot require for-profit companies to provide such coverage against their asserted religious principles. ….

The long and the short of it is that, in the relatively near future, Hobby Lobby and other such companies may be entitled to withhold contraception coverage under the ACA, but not be entitled to withhold it in states that require the coverage — currently 28 of them. Religious freedom would thus mean one thing federally and another thing in the states.


Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Tom Sramek Jr

It will be interesting to see if corporations, as “people” can HAVE religious beliefs. How are those expressed? By Board resolution? Everyone worshipping at Board meetings? Gives a new definition to the term “corporate prayer”!


“Religious freedom would thus mean one thing federally and another thing in the states.”

To go along w/ our patchwork craziness (currently) on marriage equality.

Why does Hobby Lobby get “religious freedom”—because “corporations are people, my friend”? Whereas ACTUAL people, their employees, will be denied their religious freedom. This is NUTS.

JC Fisher

Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café